Barney Rubble
International Coach
I hate cricket.
Fiery said:I really hope you are joking
PY said:Australia went from 450 to 500 in 17 balls. That's insane.
Wow. Get in the Australian team now.mohammad16 said:ive scored a half century of 11 balls in cricket 2007
Sums up the whole match tbh.Jono said:Gilly was magnificent.
England were crap.
u kidding me?? Im so glad he didnt break vivs record, it was an amazing innings but vivs was more spectacular, especially considering at the rate others scored around him. so many batsmen are scoring so much faster nowadays cuz of hte pitchesMatt79 said:My God - that was simply awesome. Best hour of play I've ever watched on telly from a batsman. He may be in decline, but so long as he's this good, I hope he keeps on going for years to come. Shame he didn't get the record, or even equal Viv - it would be no shame to be in the record book next to Richards.
Kinda surprised Ponting declared, but hopefully we'll get a wicket or two...
Viv was a much better batsman than Yousuf...are you happy Yousuf beat his record?mohammad16 said:u kidding me?? Im so glad he didnt break vivs record, it was an amazing innings but vivs was more spectacular, especially considering at the rate others scored around him. so many batsmen are scoring so much faster nowadays cuz of hte pitches
nevertheless it was a great innings, but certainly not deserving of breakin vivs record
Judging by the way he shouted "that's out" 2 or 3 times before the finger went up, I guess he agreed with it.stumpski said:Can't work out whether Boycs agrees with the decision or not.
"There's no way he couldn't have given that not out."
So were England crap when bowling Australia out on the first day then?Dravid said:Sums up the whole match tbh.
A combination of late nights/too many early mornings (it is at a point where I consider 6.30am a sleep in) meant I was pretty tired and missed the whole lot. I got home took a lay down and fell into a deep sleep and that was it.andyc said:Kinda annoyed atm. Went out for dinner for my brother's birthday when Gilchrist was on 30 odd. Got back in the car, and turned on the radio to find this
More than safe IMO.NZTailender said:Even with Lee in the side, this total should be safe.
NZTailender said:Even with Lee in the side, this total should be safe.
Yes, I'm sure Viv's 56-ball ton came against unrelentingly brilliant bowling from an all-time great attack. To have an innings like Viv's and Gilchrist's it's kinda obvious that the bowling is going to be average at best. You can go on about how scoring rates have increased in general yada yada yada, the fact is its a 21 year old record and the previously second, now third, fastest hundred was Jack Gregory from the 1920s...mohammad16 said:u kidding me?? Im so glad he didnt break vivs record, it was an amazing innings but vivs was more spectacular, especially considering at the rate others scored around him. so many batsmen are scoring so much faster nowadays cuz of hte pitches
nevertheless it was a great innings, but certainly not deserving of breakin vivs record