greg said:
The little remaining hope i've got in England's ODI team will disappear if Monty isn't picked. Anyone who thinks he should not be in the team does not understand One day cricket IMO, even more so since the "powerplays" came in and the value of wicket takers, especially economical wicket takers, increased.
Fair point yo, really can't disagree. But looking at the world cup, England best XI could be:
Strauss
Bell
Vaughan
Freddie
KP
Collingwood
Dalrymple
Read - since its unlikely my wish for Pothas won't come so soon
Lewis
Harmo
Anderson
Dalrymple may not be in the same league as Panesar in terms of quality, but this year he's proven to be a good steady bowler & overall he'd be a better option to start than him.
Again i say Gilo has been a a very reliable ODI bowler over the years & going into the WC at least his overall experience would be a better, Panesar does not have enough exposure in OD cricket to be drafted in to the team as yet, he is very accurate in test no doubt but at times his lines & lenghts do become a bit predictable & i think he would be targeted, that little over againts Symonds on day 1 should give you an idea. His chance in ODI's should come but after the WC for me.
You mention the need for economical wicket-takers with the introduction of power-plays all true, but i won't stress too much on the ``economical side`` since only McGrath & Pollock can be really put into the bracket in modern ODI cricket of ``economical wicket-takers``.
Once England pacers are on the mark they can get batsmen out, Anderson has a top SR in ODI's, Lewis has proven of late once he bowls with the 1st 30 overs when the ball is still new he can get blokes out, you know what you will get from Freddie and Harmo can do the buisness once on the mark.