Based on what? Panesar hardly got any spin (it's not like he's a slow-medium bowler like Giles) and Australia managed to lose 5 wickets to him - the pitch will take turn as it wears, Harmison knows this is his pitch which generally means he'll take 4 wickets at least per innings without too much bother.Matteh said:The game hangs on what score England make. To really capitalise on getting Aus for 244, surely 100+ is in order to put pressure on Aus. Can't see Australia getting any less than 300 in their second innings and that lead will knock a huge chunk out of the runs required total.
Thought it was a tad high tbh. Just don't get how they can give that yet not give Hussey's v Monty which looked more out.greg said:What was wrong with it?
England must take a good leadDravid said:I woke up 10 mins prior to play, damn. Oh well England better score some runs here today
Nah, I see 400+ash chaulk said:england to be allout for 321
Haha as soon as I said that McGrath picks up a wicket.Dravid said:Nah, I see 400+
lol yeah was about to say great predictionpasag said:Glenn McGrath you freaking legend. My prediction spot on atm.