LBW to Lee...GeraintIsMyHero said:Colly to ton up again tbh
nah not on this wicket - caught behind or on the pullTT Boy said:LBW to Lee...
Haha, pretty much.wpdavid said:Lemme guess - the bog-standard indeterminant prod from Bell which safely finds its way to the keeper? Give me strength ...
I'm a fan.Nnanden said:Hot Spot goes alright I reckon.
lol. Yes, well summed upwpdavid said:Lemme guess - the bog-standard indeterminant prod from Bell which safely finds its way to the keeper? Give me strength ...
Was going by that route because ‘every time’ Collingwood has played on a wicket with pace his usually been trapped LBW.superkingdave said:nah not on this wicket - caught behind or on the pull
If he does, he'll probably get rogered by Adam Gilchrist halfway to the dressing rooms, as alwayssuperkingdave said:Can see Lee getting Collingwood, Pietersen and Flintoff on this wicket, so yeah a michelle is a possibility
well yea Prior did score runs & jumped up to second choice behind Jones at the end of 2004, but he looked totally out of his depth, just as Jones & Read have done for the most part of their careers except for the odd top performance.marc71178 said:This was people advocating before he'd played, based on his runs scored, and they'd not seen him keep.
Why should England just settle for a keeper who is just capable with the gloves, pay no attention to what he does with the bat, when there is so much quality in the batting & bowling?.marc71178 said:No, the point is, we need a keeper is at least capable with the gloves (which Jones wasn't when he debuted)