Craig
World Traveller
Haven't seen the day's play until now because of work, but was England's batting shocker down to Australia bowling to well, England playing rather pathetically, and or a combination of both?
To have lost this Test after batting so well first up and to be bowled out is near criminal for mine and so is the non selection of Monty Panesar. Giles is handy with the bat and can tie a guy down, but apart from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka or Bangladesh Giles won't really run through a side. I guess a stock bowler is the term I need.
I would drop him for Monty, at least he is capable of getting wickets needed to win a game. Who knows? Australia may not have made 513 1st up.
And as I type a wide bowled by Harmison.
To have lost this Test after batting so well first up and to be bowled out is near criminal for mine and so is the non selection of Monty Panesar. Giles is handy with the bat and can tie a guy down, but apart from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka or Bangladesh Giles won't really run through a side. I guess a stock bowler is the term I need.
I would drop him for Monty, at least he is capable of getting wickets needed to win a game. Who knows? Australia may not have made 513 1st up.
And as I type a wide bowled by Harmison.