IIRC the rule about not bowling after you've been off only applies to absences of over 20 minutes, or something like that. It's to allow for toilet breaks during spells and such like.Nnanden said:Why is Flintoff allowed to bowl when he`s been off?
Thank god for that. It's common sense, really, but I was a bit concerned, particularly given some of the delays between overs at that stage. Used to be 20 overs in the final over on the fifth day, as I recall.FaaipDeOiad said:My understanding is that the new ICC time regulation does not apply on the 5th day of a test. Basically, the rule is to encourage teams to bowl their full allotment and decrease use of floodlights etc in test cricket, but it has no bearing on the final day. Play will continue, light permitting, until 90 overs have been bowled in the day.
And yeah, as you say, once the umpire declares the "last hour" has begun, there has to be 15 overs, regardless of how long they take. This is obviously designed to stop teams stalling for time when defending a total. The last hour should be in progress now, though I haven't actually seen anything about it yet. Either way, Australia will get at least 14 more overs after this one.
Try http://www.bbc.co.uk/sportdileep.vaka said:can some one suggest good website to check the scores...cricinfo is too slow
Cheers.Barney Rubble said:IIRC the rule about not bowling after you've been off only applies to absences of over 20 minutes, or something like that. It's to allow for toilet breaks during spells and such like.
No worries. Although if one of my players took a toilet break of 20 minutes, I'd be questioning the team dietician rather thoroughly.Nnanden said:Cheers.
7:30AM in England then? What are you meant to be doing today?Barney Rubble said:No worries. Although if one of my players took a toilet break of 20 minutes, I'd be questioning the team dietician rather thoroughly.