Looking better then Lee was TBHpasag said:Harmison not looking anywhere near dangerous here.
Is Dalrymple really going to be more effective as bowler then KP.aussie said:Dalrymple is a better batsman by far though, so if England wanted to play a second spinner he'd be a good back-up to the more attacking Panesar.
Not really.chaminda_00 said:Looking better then Lee was TBH
based on how he's bowled in ODI cricket, he should. JD turns it & is usually always on the spot, plus his batting is good enough to give you a 50..chaminda_00 said:Is Dalrymple really going to be more effective as bowler then KP.
Haha what? Lee at least got some reverse swing, bowled with consistent pace and took a wicket. He also caught the edge a bunch of times. He was a hell of a lot better than Harmison has been.chaminda_00 said:Looking better then Lee was TBH
Wouldn't suprise me, then again, neither would it suprise me if he got to 90 odd went for the slog and got outFaaipDeOiad said:Warne to bat all day and make a century. Anyone with me?
Would be worth the draw tbh.FaaipDeOiad said:Warne to bat all day and make a century. Anyone with me?
I`ll join you.FaaipDeOiad said:Warne to bat all day and make a century. Anyone with me?
Then it is see you later Mr Martyn.chaminda_00 said:Nice innings by Clarke, but i think Australia need five bowlers, especially on a likely flat WACA pitch.
u sledge a champion and they have a habit of making you eat your wordsFaaipDeOiad said:Warne to bat all day and make a century. Anyone with me?