Matteh
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Would love to, but i'm not a Mod.BingLeeElectric said:Please get rid of this idiot.
Would love to, but i'm not a Mod.BingLeeElectric said:Please get rid of this idiot.
You are really funny though.Matteh said:Would love to, but i'm not a Mod.
Fair bit of denial there.Arrow said:Ponting is the key. As long as he is there the aussies are still in not any trouble atm.
Because a 50 over games is as much batting as Collingwood had to do isn't it?Josh said:Having said that, bloke in a one-day game yesterday came out, opened the batting, made the lazy 159, then proceeded to open the bowling aswell and bowl his full allotment.
Wasn't trying to be clever mate I was just wondering if you think Warne can get back on top of Pietersen (so to speak )Craig said:
Sorry Mr Pedantic sir
Just slightly.marc71178 said:Because a 50 over games is as much batting as Collingwood had to do isn't it?
Even before you take into account the slightly more difficult bowling to face...
How is it denial when Ponting is averaging 100 this year and almost impossible to get out once set? Its more probable that he will take the game away frm England that get out cheap. Aussies are fine atm.pasag said:Fair bit of denial there.
You'll find that It usually only works one way.FaaipDeOiad said:Interesting that there's been so little criticism of England for their incredibly defensive tactics, after the Warne around the wicket saga.
Serious?Arrow said:How is it denial when Ponting is averaging 100 this year and almost impossible to get out once set? Its more probable that he will take the game away frm England that get out cheap. Aussies are fine atm.
'twas a 40 over game lol.marc71178 said:Because a 50 over games is as much batting as Collingwood had to do isn't it?
Even before you take into account the slightly more difficult bowling to face...
superkingdave said:just when it was looking so good, Ian Healy comes on commentary
Yes, he pointed to the line during his signal.superkingdave said:Did Bucknor call that no ball for front foot? cos it wasn't over waist height
Must have been front foot the ball was shin high.superkingdave said:Did Bucknor call that no ball for front foot? cos it wasn't over waist height