Haha, bit of a beat up really. They showed about 35 angles of it on 9, and he didn't poke anyone with his bat, nor did the security guard "step in". Langer turned around and reacted to something someone in the crowd said, took a few more steps up and then turned around a second time and glared at them. The worst thing you could accuse him of would be aggressive body language.PY said:Anyone see what happened with this:
"There weren't just glares," adds Chris in New Zealand referring to the Langer incident. "Langer used his bat but not sure what for - looked like a poke at someone - and the guy behind him (security, I think) had to step in quickly, but Langer was already walking on..."
- http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ausveng/engine/current/match/249223.html
Seems a bit odd, he copped it as he was walking off through the crowd supposedly. Bit out of character for Langer to react though isn't it? Probably a big nothing though.
hey, just wondering, r u an aussie supporter? sorry about ignorance...Perm said:The reverse swing should be a major factor, I know Hoggard and Flintoff get a bit but I'm not sure about Anderson or Harmison. I hope Giles bowls really well and keeps the batsman relatively quiet at his end, if England can swing the ball tomorrow then they should be able to dismiss Ponting and Hayden quickly and get a crack at the middle order.
Could possibly need something special from Gilly tomorrow. I'm going to be very nervous when he comes to the wicket, that's for sure (and if he doesn't come in to bat tomorrow, that can only be a good thing from Australia's perspective).Laurrz said:anyways i really hope the man in your avatar fires i forgot what it looks like for him to dominate bowling attacks in whites
Slow Love™ said:Could possibly need something special from Gilly tomorrow. I'm going to be very nervous when he comes to the wicket, that's for sure (and if he doesn't come in to bat tomorrow, that can only be a good thing from Australia's perspective).
I can never pick what form Hayden's in just from how he looks early - it often gives very little indication, I've found, and he can have a tendency to look like gold and then get himself out via impatience or sometimes arrogance in the 40's or thereabouts. He's certainly due, though, and once he gets over 70 or so, we know he can really go on to big hundreds.
KP's dismissal was quite funny - particularly given that it was obviously on his mind that he was on 158, his highest test score, and that he'd been dismissed on that score twice already. But who would think you'd hit the ball firmly to Ponting who was only two or three paces from the stumps, and try and steal a single? Absolutely death by his own hand.
Shaping up to be potentially the most interesting day of the series tomorrow. Looking forward to seeing how Harmy fares.
Open-shut case of sleep deprivation....GeraintIsMyHero said:Game on, I predict us to win late on day four
Very true.PY said:Open-shut case of sleep deprivation....
I agree, on a wicket that was always going to be flat I would have thought the sensible option would have been to pick players that were capable of bowling Australia out...although I guess in hindsight you could say the same thing about the bowlers Australia played! If Giles takes 5 for tomorrow this post will look a bit sillygrecian said:Its a very odd situation for an England fan, the more we score is great without the tail, but ironically theres that nagging feeling if we had monty (not played because it was decided we needed a longer tail) in the side we'd have more chance of winning this.
I'll be impressed if their bowlers perform and they win this test match...scoring 550 on that wicket is not indicative of a major turn around as far as the team as a whole goes yet. If they start bowling us out however things will change quite a bit. I think we'll score less than England (we'll nearly have to for anyone to win), but it'll all come down to what happens on day 4. If we can roll them on what's supposed to be a wicket that gradually takes more spin it could be good viewing on day 5.pasag said:Woah dude, massive fightback from England. I'm impressed tbh.
If Giles takes wickets tomororw it wil be off bad shots... ie. top edge sweeps.. thin edge cut shotsSon Of Coco said:I agree, on a wicket that was always going to be flat I would have thought the sensible option would have been to pick players that were capable of bowling Australia out...although I guess in hindsight you could say the same thing about the bowlers Australia played! If Giles takes 5 for tomorrow this post will look a bit silly