Coming from you? Your arse must be jealous of the **** you splatter all over this forum.You wouldn't sound so dumb if you didn't post about things you know **** all about (ie. cricket)
Coming from you? Your arse must be jealous of the **** you splatter all over this forum.You wouldn't sound so dumb if you didn't post about things you know **** all about (ie. cricket)
RelievingComing from you? Your arse must be jealous of the **** you splatter all over this forum.
You read my mindBit sick of people talking about Smith's technique as well.
It's really pretty similar to Amla.
Took people awhile to believe in amla too to be fair.Bit sick of people talking about Smith's technique as well.
It's really pretty similar to Amla.
Agreed.Bit sick of people talking about [...] technique
Didn't Bradman walk across his stumps and play to leg a lot? Or did I dream that.Bit sick of people talking about Smith's technique as well.
It's really pretty similar to Amla.
You mentioned technique...I was just giving Root the props for having a wonderful technique, but pointing out technique means nothing really. So the point in mentioning it at all when talking about batting at 3, or mentioning it all the time when talking about Smith, kind of escaped me.Who mentioned Root? Smith is brilliant but we don't need Hales to be the best batsmen in the world we need him to be a serviceable 3 which his technique should allow.
You tell me what my definitive stance is...then I'll tell you if I'm serious.Can't tell if you're serious or not with your definitive stance on Root
As an Australian supporter I wouldn't be concerned if Hales held the bat between his arse cheeks while someone spun him around like a windmill.It has been used as a reason Hales would fail at 3 (which he might) so it sounds like you agree with me. I also don't think Root has a wonderful technique.
Begs the question why you jumped in so vehemently then.As an Australian supporter I wouldn't be concerned if Hales held the bat between his arse cheeks while someone spun him around like a windmill.
It was really just to talk up Smith's successes and Root's failure. It's all I live for.Begs the question why you jumped in so vehemently then.
I Agree I think anyone who is questioning Smith's technique is a fundamentally flawed human being.It was really just to talk up Smith's successes and Root's failure. It's all I live for.
I'm also equally mystified about all the discussion over Smith's technique. Anyone talking about it still clearly hasn't been paying attention.
Haha I agree that calling Smith's technique bad is silly, but this is a bit far.I Agree I think anyone who is questioning Smith's technique is a fundamentally flawed human being.
irony1Haha I agree that calling Smith's technique bad is silly, but this is a bit far.