• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* 2nd Test at Lord's

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Yet they'd probably do a better job than Lyth has been

No point sticking with a below standard batsman just because "he's an opener" when you've got better upper/middle-order batsman who can do a better job. It's definitely a specialised position but far from impossible to adapt to. The difference between opening and no. 3/4 is often over-estimated IMO. Makeshift openers have often gone on to have successful careers. Remember Simon Katich and Shane Watson for Aus a couple years back. Even David Warner was a middle-order player when he first came in (on domestic cricket) iirc.

edit: I'm not saying they should be selected, just that there are potential options worth thinking about
makeshift openers can work but rarely do in England
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yet they'd probably do a better job than Lyth has been

No point sticking with a below standard batsman just because "he's an opener" when you've got better upper/middle-order batsman who can do a better job. It's definitely a specialised position but far from impossible to adapt to. The difference between opening and no. 3/4 is often over-estimated IMO. Makeshift openers have often gone on to have successful careers. Remember Simon Katich and Shane Watson for Aus a couple years back. Even David Warner was a middle-order player when he first came in (on domestic cricket) iirc.

edit: I'm not saying they should be selected, just that there are potential options worth thinking about
I think that's mainly because NSW had a million openers and were being stubborn.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hales is at least young enough to be worth sticking with if he's **** at the start of his test career.
He is not that young though. He would obviously be a different kind of selection to Robson/Lyth but not really because of age.
 

The Battlers Prince

International Vice-Captain
"Strangely profligate from Cook, perhaps just fed up with having to do it all himself."

This quote from ESPNCricInfo about sums it up. Hard luck Cooky, try harder next time
 

Top