• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

ODIs : Murali vs Saqlain

ODIs : Murali vs Saqlain

  • Saqlain

  • Muralitharan


Results are only viewable after voting.

Migara

International Coach
Murali had a peak between 2001 - 2005 where he was better than Saqlain at his peak. Saqlain's top ICC rating is 805. For Murali it is 913.

That is 2001 to 2005, Murali took 182 wickets in 106 matches at 17.96. if you Include 2006 then 218 at 20.2

That is basically as about 90% of Saqlain's career
 

Coronis

International Coach
Murali had a peak between 2001 - 2005 where he was better than Saqlain at his peak. Saqlain's top ICC rating is 805. For Murali it is 913.

That is 2001 to 2005, Murali took 182 wickets in 106 matches at 17.96. if you Include 2006 then 218 at 20.2

That is basically as about 90% of Saqlain's career
Stop quoting the meaningless rankings all the time.
 

Migara

International Coach
Rankings kind of also depends on your quality of opposition, or no?
Yes it seems. They have not divulged the methodology. If a bowler performs well against team with high rank bats, the rise of the rating would be high. Then doing poor against trash sides will hurt as well.
 

Migara

International Coach
And between 2000 - 2007, 278 @ 19.65, with SR of 32.7 and ER of 3.57. That is as long as Saqlain's whole career.

We can put away this Saqlain's peak stuff now.
 

Migara

International Coach
The above issue is one of the problems I see in rankings. We can understand good performance against good sides carrying more weight. However doing worse against bad sides cost more than doing same against good sides. In reality, not doing well against good sides cost the side much more. There will always be another to put their hand up and perform against trash sides, so a poor performance don't matter much in outcomes.
 

Top