Avatar bet?Bahnz in your wedding speech you're going to predict your own divorce.
Pretty sure Bahnz has a house here, we can stay therePitch a tent. We're going to be in here for a while.
One would expect Williamson's average will improve, and bats well when we have other people who can actually bat in the side i.e. Taylor. Guptill still remains a mystery as to whether he's up to it or whether he'll go the way the rest of recent openers (tried, failed, re-tried, fail, re-try, one success, fail and dropped for good) while the others (not incl. Baz and Franks) are the right side of 30 and if dropped will probably wander back into the side at some point.Look how bad these numbers are:
MJ Guptill 31.41
BB McCullum 35.38
KS Williamson 32.12
DG Brownlie 28.84
DR Flynn 27.67
BJ Watling 27.69
JEC Franklin 20.68
Sincas 32.05Look how bad these numbers are:
MJ Guptill 31.41
BB McCullum 35.38
KS Williamson 32.12
DG Brownlie 28.84
DR Flynn 27.67
BJ Watling 27.69
JEC Franklin 20.68
Not to be a **** but would you mind removing runs vs Zimbabwe, Bangladesh in NZ, McCullum pre-opener and Franklin pre-'batsman'?Look how bad these numbers are:
MJ Guptill 31.41
BB McCullum 35.38
KS Williamson 32.12
DG Brownlie 28.84
DR Flynn 27.67
BJ Watling 27.69
JEC Franklin 20.68
Zimbabwe managed 51 against us, which is 6 better than 45. Over-simplified comparison, but really, without 3-4 key players, we're minnows.Not to be a **** but would you mind removing runs vs Zimbabwe, Bangladesh in NZ, McCullum pre-opener and Franklin pre-'batsman'?
While this is largely true, I'm interested in how our batsmen fair against international quality bowling and there's no point counting runs scored against Zim in that.Zimbabwe managed 51 against us, which is 6 better than 45. Over-simplified comparison, but really, without 3-4 key players, we're minnows.
Against non-minnows:Not to be a **** but would you mind removing runs vs Zimbabwe, Bangladesh in NZ, McCullum pre-opener and Franklin pre-'batsman'?