What? Just because he has a poor ODI record doesn't mean he isn't a good player. He hasn't had many opportunites in the past to bat for long periods of time.marc71178 said:But is Oram's batting in ODI worthy of a spot?
It just underlines your lack of a cricketing brain if you think Oram is not a good enough batsman to justify selection as an all rounder in the NZ side.marc71178 said:I know he has a good Test record, but the 2 forms are not completely equivalent and sorry if questioning an average of under 19 from 62 innings as not being up to scratch.
It clearly is a superb effort and I should never have doubted him.
Ease up Matt. I agree with what Marc is saying. He's stating simply that although Oram is a quality BATSMAN in Test cricket, he's hardly shown that he is anywhere near as effective in ODI cricket. Marc never questioned his bowling or his allround ability. He questioned his batting. The same was done by Lara with regards to Dwayne Bravo.Blaze said:It just underlines your lack of a cricketing brain if you think Oram is not a good enough batsman to justify selection as an all rounder in the NZ side.
His average is always improving. For example, in his last 10 games he averages 27 with the bat which is fine for an all rounder batting at 8.
Probably not, but I think his bowling is better than the likes of Adams, Franklin, Martin and Mason anyway.marc71178 said:But is Oram's batting in ODI worthy of a spot?
Considering you have three bowlers making up twenty overs, you still have room for someone to be hit out of the attack.That's fine, but what if one of those guys gets hit out of the attack? Who do we turn to then?
Oram having nosebleeds at #6 in an ODI...NZTailender said:Nice, but if I may
Vincent
Astle
Fleming
Fulton
Styris
Oram
McCullum
Vettori
Mills
Bond
Mason
Patel
How
Marshall
Taylor
Indeed. Not sure what the justification of batting Oram ahead of Vettori is, let alone ahead of McCullum.Prince EWS said:Oram having nosebleeds at #6 in an ODI...
I would agree with you to some agree, but he hasn't really had the chances in ODIs because of where he's batting.marc71178 said:But is Oram's batting in ODI worthy of a spot?
You'll find it hard to convince a Kiwi fan that Vettori should bat ahead of McCullum and Oram.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Indeed. Not sure what the justification of batting Oram ahead of Vettori is, let alone ahead of McCullum.
Granted, there's really not much between them.
Oram since the Natwest Series in 2004:
207 runs @ 23.00
McCullum since NWS 2004:
503 @ 23.95
Vettori since NWS 2004:
320 @ 21.33
Sure would make him an interseting pinch hitter in ODI'sVoltman said:Luca's unorthodoxy is his strength and his weakness.
I think it is.marc71178 said:But is Oram's batting in ODI worthy of a spot?
Vincent does that job well enough thought doesn't he?sirjeremy11 said:Sure would make him an interseting pinch hitter in ODI's
Matt52 said:I think this team should play in the world cup.
Jesse Ryder
Nathan Astle
Ross Taylor
Stephen Fleming
Lou Vincent
Jacob Oram
Brendon McCullum
Daniel Vettori
James Franklin
Shane Bond (if he is fit)
Ian Butler (If he is fit)
Everyone is in their proper place with Ryder and Astle, 2 one day opening batsmen actually opening. (Rather than some middle order guy who drew the short straw). Taylor at 3 where he bats for CD. Fleming and Vincent in their middle order spots and the lower order pretty much picks itself. Butler and Bond give 2 genuine quick bowlers, and Ryder Astle, Taylor can chip in with the ball around the allrounders. Styris wouldnt even get a look in. I dont know how he holds his place.