New/uncommon statistics you'd like to see brought into cricket

[zaremba]

Well the tone seemed to be degenerating and I felt a longer response would not be likely to lead to a constructive discussion.

Edit:
Although granted my response wasn't necessarily the most constructive as it was...

 

[Son Of Coco]

Number of Female (or Male) ***ual conquests between innings.

Would give us an interesting insight into how having *** affects player performance. The Results could give the WAGs a more pivotal role in preparing players for the big games.

 

[fredfertang]

Percentage of benchmark00's posts that are eloquent, interesting and thought provoking

Not high but clearly on the increase. Why?

 

[G.I.Joe]

Ratio of number of texts received or sent on the eve of a match to the number of no-balls bowled the next day.

 

[Daemon]

Ratio of number of texts received or sent on the eve of a match to the number of no-balls bowled the next day.

 

[benchmark00]

Percentage of benchmark00's posts that are eloquent, interesting and thought provoking

Not high but clearly on the increase. Why?

Nah ****.

 

[Daemon]

Nah ****.

Fighting hard to keep the percentage down I see

 

[benchmark00]

Fighting hard to keep the percentage down I see

Nothing gets past you, eh?

 

[thierry henry]

Percentage of benchmark00's posts that are eloquent, interesting and thought provoking

Not high but clearly on the increase. Why?

When did this bloke go from meme-bashing self-proclaimed world's most hilarious internet novelty character to self-proclaimed world-leading authority on cricket? Mystifying tbh.

 

[benchmark00]

Probably the same time you went from nothing to constantly crying about your love life.

Which was 27-04-2003 iirc.

 

[thierry henry]

*badass meme*

 

[benchmark00]

*I did law at uni*

 

[thierry henry]

*I know everyone's life story*

 

[benchmark00]

Only because you think people care enough to constantly post about it! ffs, who posts pictures of their girlfriend on a cricket forum? Now out of this thread and look at some stats.

 

[thierry henry]

Only because you think people care enough to constantly post about it! ffs, who posts pictures of their girlfriend on a cricket forum?.

Lots of people

 

[thierry henry]

There's repeated extremely long threads of that **** ffs

A whole forum actually

 

[Spikey]

skidmark doesn't post pictures of his girlfriend cause she's ugly iirc

 

[Flem274*]

Such a disappointing flamewar. 4/10.

Oh, and stop flaming.

 

[Spark]

Back on track now, k?

EDIT: Alright so deleted about 20 posts worth of boring-ness after Flem's post. Moral: don't be boring. Back on track.

 

[Jono]

I wouldn't say its a vital stat, but I'd love to know stats of fielders with a percentage of times they hit the stumps vs. missed when throwing for a runout.

Obviously there'd be some instances of hitting the stumps from a close range (bowlers) or running up and taking the bails off which would skew it, but it'd be interesting nevertheless.

On top of that, you may see some fielders hitting the stumps more when the batsman is in, but missing when the batsman would have been short.