New Cricket Trivia - 'SJS format'

[SJS]

Wood didn't play in Waugh's debut

Ah ! There you have me

 

[membersstand]

Just a few:

six 6's in 6 balls
Century and hat-trick in the same match (I think it was even in the same day)
Six centuries in 6 innings

 

[tassietiger]

You do that, as for me, I'll be off. Answer my question though - The unique FC acheivement of Mike Procter, and it isnt his bowling average of 15.

Geez, had a look, he's done a fair bit. He got a century before lunch and followed it up with a hattrick! Twice!

But, his unique achievement, could it be two all-LBW hattricks?

 

[tassietiger]

didnt see ur post membersstand lol

 

[tassietiger]

Just another thing about Mike Procter (amazing that I'd barely heard of him)

79 minute century in 1971
57 minute century in 1979 (inc. a hattrick)
76 minute century in 1979, next game from above (also inc. a hattrick)
35 minute 92
46 minute 92

geez he must have been good.

 

[membersstand]

Geez, had a look, he's done a fair bit. He got a century before lunch and followed it up with a hattrick! Twice!

But, his unique achievement, could it be two all-LBW hattricks?

Didn't see that one, but I have a feeling it's the one bookie's after

 

[SJS]

Just another thing about Mike Procter (amazing that I'd barely heard of him)

79 minute century in 1971
57 minute century in 1979 (inc. a hattrick)
76 minute century in 1979, next game from above (also inc. a hattrick)
35 minute 92
46 minute 92

geez he must have been good.

There are some who consider him a better all rounder than Sobers. That may be debated but it says something about his class. A tragedy that he was lost to test cricket.

 

[Bookie]

Geez, had a look, he's done a fair bit. He got a century before lunch and followed it up with a hattrick! Twice!
But, his unique achievement, could it be two all-LBW hattricks?

No, his unique acheivement is the fact that he is the only player to get a hatrick and a century in the same match on two occasions.

Eddy, you had the idea, but you did not say he did it twice.

I give it to Tassietiger, and hopefully, you'll post the next question soon.

If hes not here, then SJS, would you mind doing the next one?

 

[membersstand]

I'll go next...

 

[membersstand]

I'm thinking of a certain occurence that has happened only twice in test cricket, Once in the seventies and once in the last ten years. What is it ?

 

[Bookie]

I'm thinking of a certain occurence that has happened only twice in test cricket, Once in the seventies and once in the last ten years. What is it ?

handled the ball?

 

[membersstand]

handled the ball?

No.

(proper format coming soon)

 

[tassietiger]

Something to do with teams dominating the rest of the competition?

 

[membersstand]

Something to do with teams dominating the rest of the competition?

No.

 

[membersstand]

I'm thinking of a certain occurence that has happened only twice in test cricket, Once in the seventies and once in the last ten years. What is it?


Q1: Bookie: Handled the Ball? NO
Q2: tassietiger: Something to do with teams dominating the rest of the competition? NO

 

[tassietiger]

Double-Bouncer?

 

[membersstand]

I'm thinking of a certain occurence that has happened only twice in test cricket, Once in the seventies and once in the last ten years. What is it?


Q1: Bookie: Handled the Ball? NO
Q2: tassietiger: Something to do with teams dominating the rest of the competition? NO
Q3: tassietiger: Double-bouncer? NO

 

[Bookie]

Is it form of dismissal?

 

[membersstand]

I'm thinking of a certain occurence that has happened only twice in test cricket, Once in the seventies and once in the last ten years. What is it?


Q1: Bookie: Handled the Ball? NO
Q2: tassietiger: Something to do with teams dominating the rest of the competition? NO
Q3: tassietiger: Double-bouncer? NO
Q4: Bookie: Is it mode of dismissal? NO

 

[SJS]

Is it to do with batting ?