YesAdamc said:Is it to do with centuries (or lack thereof)?
Ok We will give it to you.Adamc said:I'm not sure where to go from here.
OK, I was thinking of something along those lines. I think there are players 'higher' than those three though... Ian Healy and Jeff Dujon to name two. They have played 168 and 169 matches respectively without a century, and neither have bowled. Unless I'm not understanding the criteria properly.SJS said:Ok We will give it to you.
These three are the three non bowlers (none of them have bowled a single delivery in ODI's) to have played maximum games
Moin : 219
Rashid : 166
Mongia: 140
.....without getting a hundred.\\
Your turn
No. Although you could argue that the fact that there were no runouts in this innings is a particularly rare achievement in itself.BoyBrumby said:Is it to do with running out batting partners?!
No.Jamee999 said:Batting on all 5 days.
Umm..err...I'm not really sure as that question could be interpreted in several ways. Ask another.BoyBrumby said:Is the achievement connected with how Boycott scored his runs?
No.BoyBrumby said:Ha! Ok: is it connected with the scoring of boundaries in his innings?
No.BoyBrumby said:Was Boycott playing for England in the match in question?
Yes.BoyBrumby said:Ummm. Was it a first class match?
Yes.BoyBrumby said:Is it to do with being outscored by his batting partners?