Probably wouldn't have gotten into the side for injuries anyway. While he's been pretty good in the A and Top End limited over games, he's never been up to much in that format domestically.He would have been dropped earlier if injuries hadn't occurred I suspect.
Glad as hell you're not a NZ selector then.If I was a selector he'd be batting at three in both forms of the game for New Zealand.
We also did it with Craig Cumming and Daniel Flynn.In addition to my prior comments, please answer the following question.........
Name any another International team (Bangladesh included) that would continue to select a specialist batsman for their ODI side who after 16 innings averaged 15 with the bat & had strike-rate in the mid 60s?
Sums it up for me right there....that being one has to make reference to a performance in a meaningless warm-up game (when a bowling team generally experiments & tries different things) to make a point in his favour.Broom Good points
Scored a good 50 in a warm up game against India (one of the top teams in the world)
.
I do think Broom should go back to domestic cricket for a while, but I just have to mention that McCullum's record was something like that for his first couple of years too.We also did it with Craig Cumming and Daniel Flynn.
The question was of any OTHER International team.We also did it with Craig Cumming and Daniel Flynn.
I think so too, Yes, up until 2007 I believe McCullum's ODI average was in the low 20's.I do think Broom should go back to domestic cricket for a while, but I just have to mention that McCullum's record was something like that for his first couple of years too.
Even so, McCullum's record at that time (average low 20s & SR around 75-80) was still perfectly acceptable at for an International wicket-keeper/batsman coming in at no.7 in that era (2002-07). This as opposed to a specialist ODI batsman averaging 15 & striking at 64 in 2009.I think so too, Yes, up until 2007 I believe McCullum's ODI average was in the low 20's.
Pretty hard for a specialist batsmen to do anything of note when coming in at seven, he's pretty much doomed to fail.Even so, McCullum's record at that time (average low 20s & SR around 75-80) was still perfectly acceptable at for an International wicket-keeper/batsman coming in at no.7 in that era (2002-07). This as opposed to a specialist ODI batsman averaging 15 & striking at 64 in 2009.
After two years of international cricket, McCullum averaged only 19.21.Even so, McCullum's record at that time (average low 20s & SR around 75-80) was still perfectly acceptable at for an International wicket-keeper/batsman coming in at no.7 in that era (2002-07). This as opposed to a specialist ODI batsman averaging 15 & striking at 64 in 2009.