• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Murali's action reported to ICC by referee Chris Broad

age_master

Hall of Fame Member
Langeveldt said:
If he is found to be really quite dodgy. what will the consequences be.. After all he already has 500 odd test wickets... Seems a bit pointless to me...
this should have happened as soon as he first bowled his doosra.
 

Craig

World Traveller
Langeveldt said:
If he is found to be really quite dodgy. what will the consequences be.. After all he already has 500 odd test wickets... Seems a bit pointless to me...
But that is for one delievry though, not his whole bowling.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
marc71178 said:
No matter what people thought of them - Qadir (236 @ 32.80) and Chandrasaker (242 @ 29.74) were neither as prolific nor as good average-wise as Warne.

Warne also came in at a time when spin bowling was not regarded too highly, and did a fine job in changing that.
It helped that he was as marketable as Tom Cruise.
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Murali's action reported to ICC by referee Chris Broad

marc71178 said:
also invented a dieting art... ;)
LOL.

IMO he does chuck, but this doesn't proove anything yet.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Murali's action reported to ICC by referee Chris Broad

Tom Halsey said:
LOL.

IMO he does chuck, but this doesn't proove anything yet.
I haven't seen the doosra from enough angles enough times to comment - but you have to be an idiot to maintain the stock ball involves varying sinuosity...
 

NikhilN

International Regular
Craig said:
Being reported doesnt prove anything YET.

I double that...you could be reported for picking your nose on the field...being reported does not mean anything until ICC says something about the issue
 

Linda

International Vice-Captain
It always makes me laugh at times like this when cricketers from other teams reply to 'Do you think he chucks?' with 'He's a champion bowler' or something.
I know they can't say anything, but it still gives me a bit of a giggle.
 

Craig

World Traveller
That is because of crickets gagging laws.

They could just roll off the usual "No comment" or say "sorry I cant comment" or "next question".
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Craig said:
That is because of crickets gagging laws.

They could just roll off the usual "No comment" or say "sorry I cant comment" or "next question".
It's the same in any business or profession - it's called 'closing ranks' - usually tempered with a little 'there but for the grace of God go I'.
 

Top