subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Which combo is best for your average team?
What about Sanga as keeper?Probably Waugh cause you get a good captain too. Good captain could be quite valuable to an average side
Then you get keeper Sanga’s batting.What about Sanga as keeper?
Anchor may be more useful for an average team.Waugh is too much of an anchor for me to have. Give me the Sri Lankans.
Sanga as a batsman alone is about 14 - 15 runs clear of Waugh. The Average difference between Murali and Warne with the bat is way less than that (6.5)Which combo is best for your average team?
Waugh is a better batsman, Sanga had better career.Sanga as a batsman alone is about 14 - 15 runs clear of Waugh. The Average difference between Murali and Warne with the bat is way less than that (6.5)
15 run difference is way too large even if the runs were easy.Waugh is a better batsman, Sanga had better career.
Sanga Just scored so many easy runs but steve waugh had to fight with legendary bolwers for some runs.
Remove minnows and adjust for the fact that he had 2/3rds of tests at home.15 run difference is way too large even if the runs were easy.
Good question IMO. Warne clearly must have chucked it to get that much spin with such accuracy, so Murali it is.Which spinner is better?
You can do it for the Waugh's record against Sri Lanka in Australia in 80s and early 90s.Remove minnows and adjust for the fact that he had 2/3rds of tests at home.
Nah.You can do it for the Waugh's record against Sri Lanka in Australia in 80s and early 90s.
Still as a pure batsman it is a gulf as big as that of America.
Yes, figured this was obvious.Waugh is a better batsman, Sanga had better career.
Sanga Just scored so many easy runs but steve waugh had to fight with legendary bolwers for some runs.