Langeveldt
Soutie
Legglancer said:Welcome to the forum Cactus, I think its wonderful to have some femail company here ..... lol ... their is only so much one can take of guy like "kenny" you know .
Do I still count as female company?
Legglancer said:Welcome to the forum Cactus, I think its wonderful to have some femail company here ..... lol ... their is only so much one can take of guy like "kenny" you know .
Absolutely .... If you are the one on the Pic ...Langeveldt said:Do I still count as female company?
Sorry, I just assumed. My apologies.Cactus said:i maintain the fact that it still isn't any of your damn business and not everyone whose fanatical about their cricket has to be a boy!!!!
i am a girl !!
Well in fact Australians are well known for their 'fair go' attitude - this is known worldwide my friend.Legglancer said:"Fair go people" eh ??? lol what a load of bull ...
No wonder Muralitharan once swore he would never tour Australia. If it is not
about illegal actions they are bound to rake up an issue concerning the umpiring. They have
conveniently forgotten that 'chuckers' such as Meckiff, Burke, Rorke, Tretheway, Hitchcox et al,
and umpires Mel McInnes, who almost ruined the 1960-61 West Indies series and Steve Randall, jailed for immoral conduct, are Australians. People in glass houses should not.
Oops ... I almost forgot the Warne/Mark Waugh match fixing controvesy .... wake up and smell the dung around you buddy .... Simple explanation "Frog in the Well Syndrome" !!!:duh:
Actually kenny is my real name - no need for inverted commas.Legglancer said:Welcome to the forum Cactus, I think its wonderful to have some femail company here ..... lol ... their is only so much one can take of guy like "kenny" you know .
Cheers Richard - I have no problem with either your logic or your position.Richard said:I have given my reasons why I think Murali has been questioned sufficiently.
And I have given my reasons why the fact that you are in the majority when questioning Murali's action (or simply branding it illegal) is irrelevant - because most of them simply don't know what they're talking about.
Many, many people just don't understand the rule, and plenty assume on one or two pictures and what the like of you tell them.
If you have looked at the evidence used at UWA you are in a position not many are, and you have slightly more authority to question their findings than most do.
Still, as I say, I have given my reasons why I think your concerns are unfounded.
Actually I think that was precisely the implication.........imagine if I or another Australian had said similar things about Sri Lankans, or Indians, or whoever.Swervy said:mmm...hope the implication isnt that all Australians are like the above.
I think it is fair comment that Australia does have a 'fair go' culture...but if an Aussie thinks something is unfair he will let you know....now people (whether they be Australian or whatever) who do think Murali is a chucker, well , its an opinion.
I do recall the English 'papers' implying quite a lot about Murali's action a few months ago, so lets not just have a dig at the Aussie press about this.
Rikki, Rikki, Rikki.......once again, you miss the point.Rik said:I'm guessing because his family live there and he happens to be one of the small Sri Lankan element of Australian society? Any reason why you don't choose to live in the North Pole?