You are funny. Morkel > WillisWillis took 44 wickets @ 23.22 in Asia in 15 games. He was good on all surfaces.
For me the answer is Willis by a distance considering Willis had far less support from other bowlers too. He had less pressure being created from the other end. Morkel has had the likes of Steyn, Philander and others creating pressure for him from the other end. This isn't really a contest for me and I find it a little funny anyone is saying Morkel. I strongly disagree with Morkel over Willis. Willis for me and no contest.
Courtney Walsh, Fazal Mahmood, Waqar Younis.Willis is a rarity as a fast bowler & bunny batsman who was a test captain. Who are other examples?
On what basis?You are funny. Morkel > Willis
South AfricanOn what basis?
Same as the one poster above me used.On what basis?
Morkel maybe but I am not.South African
In what way?Same as the one poster above me used.
Thanks, had forgotten about Walsh and Waqar and didn't know about Mahmood.Courtney Walsh, Fazal Mahmood, Waqar Younis.
Ian Botham only averaged 13 as captain over 12 matches but despite the stats he was obviously not a bunny batsman.
I don’t think they are considering the average differential and the lack of support Willis got in comparison. Plus Willis’s faster strike rate. Choosing Morkel just shows bias. He was effective in Asia and there was an implication he was ineffective on pitches that weren’t bowler friendly, he was effective on all surfaces. . Perhaps it’s just nativity and favouring a more recent player, but that in itself is bias. If you don’t like my conclusion then disagree with it. You can get offended all you like, it doesn’t really change the reality of the comparison.They are probably on the same level and one can make a strong argument for Morkel. But I don’t care who picks who. I take issue with that poster calling it a no contest and saying that it’s funny someone would even think Morkel was better. That line of arguments are boring.
We are still waiting for you to explain your reasoning. The problem is you don’t have anything of substance. You just like Morkel more. This is about who is the better bowler, nothing else. You are basically talking out your backside and the poll results show an enormous majority to Willis for good reason. You’re on my ignore list now by the way.You are funny. Morkel > Willis
Ironic that you criticise someone else's argument as being boring but don't post any sort of actual argument as to why he's wrong.They are probably on the same level and one can make a strong argument for Morkel. But I don’t care who picks who. I take issue with that poster calling it a no contest and saying that it’s funny someone would even think Morkel was better. That line of arguments are boring.
I don't think the forum will allow him to ignore me (or the other mods), but maybe that's been changed.John will soon have the entire forum on ignore at this rate.