• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

More friendlies using the WCC Sim

S

Sriram k

Total Cricket Moderator
Here are some 4 day friendlies run using the official WCC Sim.120 matches in all.Included are the scorecards as well as the records file.Each team playing 4 games against other 2 teams in their division and 2 games against an academy team.
This should probably help in deciding whom to keep and whom to kick out


Sriram
 
Last edited:
S

Sriram k

Total Cricket Moderator
Heres the Records file.
Also included is the records viewer which has been updated slightly since the older 1 had a limit of only adding 500 players.Adding of academy teams increased the number of players to abt 700.

Sriram
 

Attachments

Slats4ever

Slats4ever

International Vice-Captain
Upon seeing these can I voice my concern at some of the results.
I think the whole idea of being experienced means you score more runs is stupid, Michael Clarke is probably a better batter than Mark Waugh, yet in this sim Mark WAugh would probably avg like 30 more if he were still playing.
I think we should stay with VC 4, or change the idea a little with how if u're more experienced you get more runs.
 
bugssy

bugssy

Cricketer Of The Year
mate i am a big nsw fan and there is NO WAY clarke is better than waugh. no way. m waugh is tooo classy he was just too relaxed.
 
age_master

age_master

Hall of Fame Member
bugssy said:
mate i am a big nsw fan and there is NO WAY clarke is better than waugh. no way. m waugh is tooo classy he was just too relaxed.
Click to expand...

hahaha i rate clarke better too, but they are different styles of player so you cant really compare

i also think that the experience thing should be toned down a little, atm its giving a little too mcuh advantage to the old buggers ;)
 
Blewy

Blewy

Cricketer Of The Year
It depends on how the experience is worked out... Im not sure if its age or if its matches played... I think that both should be taken into account but i think that the rookies with an average of 40 should not be as good as a guy who has played over 100 matches with an ave of 40....

Ill speak to Sri about it...
 
S

Sriram k

Total Cricket Moderator
It was general view in the overskilled thread sometime back tht the youth were far too good.If the old pros dominate then it was meant to be tht way.I mean how many times have we seen tendulkar being outscored ina season by a debutant??
I think this way it seems far more real.Last season NSW had a pack of rl stars in their team but they got relegated.Doesnt really sound good does it? If you had Bevan,Kallis,Lara,Cairns all playing for u in rl wud u imagine getting relegated in a real life league?
I think this just adds up to the realism.Yes ppl mite have to take a different stand in trades now but I think its good 4 the game over all.

Sriram
 
S

Sriram k

Total Cricket Moderator
Blewy said:
It depends on how the experience is worked out... Im not sure if its age or if its matches played... I think that both should be taken into account but i think that the rookies with an average of 40 should not be as good as a guy who has played over 100 matches with an ave of 40....

Ill speak to Sri about it...
Click to expand...
yes both are taken into accout GB.

Sriram
 
Blewy

Blewy

Cricketer Of The Year
No complaints here, i have a very young side but i am going by the theory that the more they play the better they will get..
I am taking a slight risk for next season by doing this but in the long run i think it will pay dividends...
 
age_master

age_master

Hall of Fame Member
Blewy said:
No complaints here, i have a very young side but i am going by the theory that the more they play the better they will get..
I am taking a slight risk for next season by doing this but in the long run i think it will pay dividends...
Click to expand...

same for a few teams i think


also instead of replacing rookies next season why dont we do a CM and regen them - randomly ofcousre to all of the teams that had retirements - this might stop or slow any future overskill
 
S

Sriram k

Total Cricket Moderator
age_master said:

also instead of replacing rookies next season why dont we do a CM and regen them - randomly ofcousre to all of the teams that had retirements - this might stop or slow any future overskill
Click to expand...
I didnt get this. Pls explain a bit.

Sriram
 
nibbs

nibbs

International Captain
question: I was looking at T.Rowells stats. In the one dayers it says that he averages 47, when the rookies file said his average was 49. Whats going on here?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top