Okay? So you should understand why calling someone who ****ed up once as an 18 year old morally bankrupt is problematicSo was I once. And I was awful.
He was paid money to deliberately under perform. Should never have played again. Don’t care if he was 17, 23 (most likely his real age back then) or 30. Gone.Correct, you implied that the result was null and void, which I am sympathetic to, however under most definitions and my own understanding this is what separates match fixing from spot fixing, semantic issue regarding terminology but I consider the two acts to be different crimes, not different expressions of the same crime
Well I hope you were given a certificate after all the effort you put inYour ancestors sent my ancestors to this island prison for stealing a loaf of bread. We wanted to distance ourselves from your haughty, proper english and by god we did it
Was he paid to do anything other than bowl one no ball? It's a little extreme to call that underperforming, that implies much more.He was paid money to deliberately under perform. Should never have played again. Don’t care if he was 17, 23 (most likely his real age back then) or 30. Gone.
Good riddance to him tbh.
He took a 6 fer in that innings. He was obviously still trying to win the gameWas he paid to do anything other than bowl one no ball? It's a little extreme to call that underperforming, that implies much more.
In essence I agree though, the match was tainted, he as a player will always be completely tainted and there is a very legitimate argument that he should never have played again, certainly not trying to justify his career being allowed to continue after only 5 years
That’s under performing for money though. I dunno, something sticks in my craw about tanking in general like Tomic and Kyrgios sometimes do, let alone taking some bookie’s cash even to bowl a no ball.Was he paid to do anything other than bowl one no ball? It's a little extreme to call that underperforming, that implies much more.
In essence I agree though, the match was tainted, he as a player will always be completely tainted and there is a very legitimate argument that he should never have played again, certainly not trying to justify his career being allowed to continue after only 5 years