• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Mitchell starc

halba

International 12th Man
Starc probably just underperformed against India, he was a gun bowler on those slow decks in Pakistan and has a good record against England.

All top bowlers have that one team against whom they tend to underperform, Steyn against England comes to mind.
Warne v India also. Warne was very good v SL and PAK from memory.
Mcgrath didnt have anywhere he under performed i believe- was world class though - maybe against Tendulkar/Lara/Kallis at times only - but who didnt struggle against those ?
Ricky ponting V India also, for batting. Harbhajan was a nightmare.
everyone has an Achilles heel unless ure Sir Don
 
Last edited:

halba

International 12th Man
If aus lose this test, definitely will be going for Neser and Starc for the 2nd test. Hazlewood- who has injury issues should rest again with a view to the 3rd test, and Boland is not suited to ENG conditions- he bowls too short for ENG conditions.

2nd test is on 28th june.

So two fresh quicks to add to the iron man Pat Cummins, also i think Lords will suit Neser and Starc better plus add some depth to the batting.

8.Neser
9.Starc
10Cummins
11Lyon

Advantage- is that the batting goes down to no.10 in Pat Cummins(assuming he bats like he did in #1 innings).
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If aus lose this test, definitely will be going for Neser and Starc for the 2nd test. Hazlewood- who has injury issues should rest again, and Boland is not suited to ENG conditions- he bowls too short for ENG conditions.
Why would Australia winning or losing impact the decision to drop your bowlers given Australia have done all the bowling they'll be doing this game? Unless you mean it's to solve for the long tail?
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Why would Australia winning or losing impact the decision to drop your bowlers given Australia have done all the bowling they'll be doing this game? Unless you mean it's to solve for the long tail?
Well done you are infinitely smarter than *checks notes* all selectors everywhere
 

halba

International 12th Man
Why would Australia winning or losing impact the decision to drop your bowlers given Australia have done all the bowling they'll be doing this game? Unless you mean it's to solve for the long tail?
long tail the main reason. plus if its a loss, its worth changing the bowlers next game.
 

Top