• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Mitch Marsh

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
teams give talented allrounders a long rope because if they come good they win you lots of ****. Sometimes it doesn't work out, being an allrounder is in a tough gig and most don't make it. He came into the current series with better form than the rest of the aussie top order so it's kinda insane how quickly everyone's switched back to saying he always sucked.

it's not rocket science
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
teams give talented allrounders a long rope because if they come good they win you lots of ****. Sometimes it doesn't work out, being an allrounder is in a tough gig and most don't make it. He came into the current series with better form than the rest of the aussie top order so it's kinda insane how quickly everyone's switched back to saying he always sucked.

it's not rocket science
Yeah he really saved their backsides against Pak and NZ in those series. Him being in the side was justified at first, but he's been so bad this series that persisting for 4 tests has looked extremely dumb.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
If Mitch Marsh playing like this still did well against England they should just pack it in tbh
This would make me question the game if Bradman more than anything else tbh.

Bradman? Oh you mean the guy who was only twice as good as Marsh against England.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
teams give talented allrounders a long rope because if they come good they win you lots of ****. Sometimes it doesn't work out, being an allrounder is in a tough gig and most don't make it. He came into the current series with better form than the rest of the aussie top order so it's kinda insane how quickly everyone's switched back to saying he always sucked.

it's not rocket science
well I think part of the reason why the backlash has been so quick this time is

A) Everyone knew Marsh's luck would run-out and when that happened we weren't interested in seeing him struggle and struggle
B) They're pretty clearly lying about how fit MMarsh is to bowl
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
How easily we forget that Marsh won last year's Alan Border Medal. His performances in the last Ashes series warranted some perseverance but, after this BG series it's time to allow him to concentrate on white ball cricket.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I might be wrong but I think he actually was statistically our best performed Test bat for the 12 month period after the WTC

I'm on the drop Marsh train now for sure but at the start of this summer the stats were backing him
AB medal covers a different period though doesn't it? Because I'm fairly sure Khawaja won Test player
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Going into the series, these were the batting averages for the top 7 in the previous twelve months (McSweeney/Konstas obviously hadn't played at all yet):

Marsh 45.45
Khawaja 34.38
Carey 33.00
Smith 33.18
Labuschagne 27.08
Head 22.41

Now I still had basically no faith in him coming into this series and I always expected the bubble to pop (I wouldn't have recalled him when they did tbh), and I said so multiple times, but when someone's been your best bat for a year - probably the only one even at par output, bar maybe Carey - then they probably do deserve a little bit of a run. Even if they aren't bowling.

He absolutely shouldn't have played in Melbourne but I can see why he'd earned a bit of rope up until then.
 

Top