Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I agree!
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Miller: six or out?
- Thread starter ragsubra
- Start date
Brook's side
International Regular
it's compressing mate, but it shows the impact of the foot on the sponge and shows the ripple on the apron at the bottom of the sponge.
his foot clipped the sponge.
.
Brook's side
International Regular
Apologies, I think the footage I was referring to must be fake.
The aerial clip it's difficult to see because of a caption on the screen, but I'm 99% there's a few inches between the foot and the boundary in that shot as centurymaker says.
Unless the one I saw is the stride before the one you can see in the aerial shot. **** knows.
EDIT
So, apologies, I think it's possibly an optical illusion. When the foot is planted, from that new angle you don't see part of the cushion as it's behind the foot. It just happens that a little bit of the apron at the bottom of the sponge behind the foot is like crinckled/crumpled. so when the foot is removed from the shot as he goes into the next step, that part of the sponge is suddenly exposed, which makes it look like it moves.
i think the aerial shot just about proves it was inside the sponge. apologies.
The aerial clip it's difficult to see because of a caption on the screen, but I'm 99% there's a few inches between the foot and the boundary in that shot as centurymaker says.
Unless the one I saw is the stride before the one you can see in the aerial shot. **** knows.
EDIT
So, apologies, I think it's possibly an optical illusion. When the foot is planted, from that new angle you don't see part of the cushion as it's behind the foot. It just happens that a little bit of the apron at the bottom of the sponge behind the foot is like crinckled/crumpled. so when the foot is removed from the shot as he goes into the next step, that part of the sponge is suddenly exposed, which makes it look like it moves.
i think the aerial shot just about proves it was inside the sponge. apologies.
Last edited:
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sunil1z
International Regular
1 is OK but not 3 in 6 decisions. And that was the least controversial. Other 2 were even more disputed.
Sunil1z
International Regular
If you really wanted to put image , you should have put Gill’s catch in WTC final . Unnecessary drama over a 50-50 catch . And on top of that he put that catch image on his Twitter account 
Imagine players started whining on social media every time a decision goes against them
Imagine players started whining on social media every time a decision goes against them
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Sunil1z
International Regular
And in reply he would have posted WC Final image . I think after last year WC Final , we have reached draw with the Aussies in trolling department.
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Nah.. Tests > ODIs > T20Is
Otherwise, we should troll back with our KO punch to them this WC.
or that Yuvi image from 2011.
Dendarii
International Debutant
I've seen that clip and it's not clear and obvious. And this is coming from someone who was desperately hoping while watching the replays that his foot had touched it. Like I said before, I have no problem with it being given out.
flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I like the moaning that the boundary sponge had been moved and that the faded area inside it is where the rope should have been and as his foot was over that it should have been 6.
Arachnodouche
International Captain
ashley bach
Cricketer Of The Year
Diego Maradona's 
>>> Suryakumar Yadav's 
>>> Suryakumar Yadav's
Sunil1z
International Regular
centurymaker
Cricketer Of The Year
This optical illusion has already been debunked.
Aerial clip confirms it was a clean catch.
Victor Ian
International Coach
why would they move the boundary from its previous position anyway? its not like it was moved to perfectly center it to the pitch, as it was only moved about 30cm and grounds everywhere always have short and long sides, etc. i think india directed this to diminish SA 6 hitting and in that sense, this is a dark day for cricket. it just abominable.
