• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Mcgrath vs Wasim Akram

Better odi bowler?


  • Total voters
    25

Silver Silva

International Regular
McGrath not just a great record but also helped his team win 3 World Cups , people will say he had a great team but he was a big reason why they were great. Also we've seen quality teams fail to get over the line in the past , I always felt Pakistan kind of underachieved in the 90's and early 2000's..One World Cup win does not reflect the talent they had, McGrath had that winning mentality.
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
McGrath not just a great record but also helped his team win 3 World Cups , people will say he had a great team but he was a big reason why they were great. Also we've seen quality teams fail to get over the line in the past , I always felt Pakistan kind of underachieved in the 90's and early 2000's..One World Cup win does not reflect the talent they had, McGrath had that winning mentality.
Lol. McGrath's team was filled with ATGs. Even without Mcgrath they were super strong.
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
McGrath is an ATG himself , he contributed to making Australia strong
Mark Waugh, Bevan, Ponting, Lee, Warne, Mcgrath, Symonds, Gilly, Watson, Bracken, Hussey ...

All these guys good enough to play in most country's Alltime 11s.
McGrath was a superb bowler, he benefitted from playing for a super strong team though.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
From what I remember Akram was the bowler most consistently bowling 4 or more overs in the final 10 overs of the innings. That was when the real hitting happened in ODIs at the time. He was just the best at death bowling. McGrath was a better new ball bowler but coming to the death I would prefer Akram.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
McGrath not just a great record but also helped his team win 3 World Cups , people will say he had a great team but he was a big reason why they were great. Also we've seen quality teams fail to get over the line in the past , I always felt Pakistan kind of underachieved in the 90's and early 2000's..One World Cup win does not reflect the talent they had, McGrath had that winning mentality.
McGrath was extremely lucky as well to have arguably the greatest batting lineups ever assembled to play for his team. Both in ODIs and Tests. Mark Waugh, Steve Waugh, Adam Gilchrist, Ricky Ponting, Damien Martyn, Matthew Hayden, Michael Clarke, Michael Hussey. Just one ridiculously good player after the other. The scoreboard pressure was enough for most teams to be mentally shot before even attempting to compete.
 

Silver Silva

International Regular
McGrath was extremely lucky as well to have arguably the greatest batting lineups ever assembled to play for his team. Both in ODIs and Tests. Mark Waugh, Steve Waugh, Adam Gilchrist, Ricky Ponting, Damien Martyn, Matthew Hayden, Michael Clarke, Michael Hussey. Just one ridiculously good player after the other. The scoreboard pressure was enough for most teams to be mentally shot before even attempting to compete.
Pakistan had a ridiculous amount of talent in the 90's and early 2000's that couldn't gel together as a team , they gave rise to Ijaz Ahmed , Saeed Anwar , Mushtaq Ahmed , Saqlain Mushtaq, Razzaq , Afridi , Waqar , Shoaib Akthar, Mohammad Yousuf , Inzamam Ul Haq etc ..

Always scandals , poor discipline, big egos in the team so they are prime example that talent is not everything ..so McGrath was not lucky , the Aussies put cricket first above all and got what they deserved ..
 

smash84

The Tiger King
Pakistan had a ridiculous amount of talent in the 90's and early 2000's that couldn't gel together as a team , they gave rise to Ijaz Ahmed , Saeed Anwar , Mushtaq Ahmed , Saqlain Mushtaq, Razzaq , Afridi , Waqar , Shoaib Akthar, Mohammad Yousuf , Inzamam Ul Haq etc ..

Always scandals , poor discipline, big egos in the team so they are prime example that talent is not everything ..so McGrath was not lucky , the Aussies put cricket first above all and got what they deserved ..
Lol, so you are agreeing with me?

I didn't know that Razzaq, Afridi, Saqlain, and Mushtaq were great batsmen :S
 

Silver Silva

International Regular
Lol, so you are agreeing with me?

I didn't know that Razzaq, Afridi, Saqlain, and Mushtaq were great batsmen :S
(Great players).. no I don't think McGrath was lucky. You don't make 4 finals with 3 world cup wins with his performances by luck ..

He was destroying batting line ups even at 37
 

smash84

The Tiger King
(Great players).. no I don't think McGrath was lucky. You don't make 4 finals with 3 world cup wins with his performances by luck ..

He was destroying batting line ups even at 37
Errr, do you remember the 2003 world cup final? And the 2007 world cup final? Exactly the scoreboard pressure I am talking about. Also 1996 WC he wasn't that great which is understandable since he was very new to world cricket. You are trying to act as if McGrath was the sole reason they were making it to the finals and he was the most valuable player in the finals. He just wasn't.

I am not saying that McGrath had no skill. He is probably top 3 ODI bowlers. I just don't think he's the greatest ever.
 

Top