honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Procter?Genius Sobers.. Master Bradman
Genius Viv...... Master Gavaskar
Genius Akram.. Master Hadlee
Master Genius Kapil Dev ?
( Master Bowler + Genius Batsman )
Procter?Genius Sobers.. Master Bradman
Genius Viv...... Master Gavaskar
Genius Akram.. Master Hadlee
Master Genius Kapil Dev ?
( Master Bowler + Genius Batsman )
It's luck in whether it works well or not. Success isn't guaranteed in cricket, so whether it's a good plan or not is only really noticed by people in hindsight, regardless of what went into it earlier. And besides, there's not much that can be done nowadays to say that X captain has innovated something gamechanging that isn't already been noticed and highlighted by staff/players, so this would only favour the pioneers who had the fortune of having the talent and conditions necessary to pull off such innovations.Not sure it's luck. There is a sort of intuition these captains have.
Genius Master duh.Procter?
A person who averaged 100 is surely a Genius.Genius Sobers.. Master Bradman
Genius Viv...... Master Gavaskar
Genius Akram.. Master Hadlee
Master Genius Kapil Dev ?
( Master Bowler + Genius Batsman )
Andy Ganteaume was very ingenious.. He stopped playing international cricket after averaging 100+ in the first match.A person who averaged 100 is surely a Genius.
What about Syd Barnes?
Neither. They are just different types of players who achieve top results. Geniuses are more attractive in style of plays though perhaps.@subshakerz what's better? Master or genius?
Then I don't think these classifications are of any use, no?Neither. They are just different types of players who achieve top results. Geniuses are more attractive in style of plays though perhaps.
So it's only useful to rank players?Then I don't think these classifications are of any use, no?
AgreedRoot is a master, Pietersen was a genius.
You dug up a year+ old thread to say that the thread is useless? Kind of ironicThen I don't think these classifications are of any use, no?
iirc I think subz used someone being a “genius” as a reason to rank them over another player of the same level in a recent thread. Probs what brought this on.You dug up a year+ old thread to say that the thread is useless? Kind of ironic
Yeah as a personal preference when it is hard to split players who are more or less equal.iirc I think subz used someone being a “genius” as a reason to rank them over another player of the same level in a recent thread. Probs what brought this on.
Master > Genius confirmedBarrington was a Master.
Compton was a Genius.