• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Mark Waugh vs Laxman

The Better Bat

  • Laxman

    Votes: 26 89.7%
  • Mark Waugh

    Votes: 3 10.3%

  • Total voters
    29

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
**** I think I remember that too. That was the Pak series in UAE/SL wasn't it. Should have been dropped at least 6 months before that. 37 years old, not making runs, looks terrible at the crease and they had at least half a dozen absolute gun domestic batsmen who would come in and average 45.
Yeah his 2001 ashes was really his last hurrah, the last 12 months were a sad decline. At least it was only 12 months though
 

Coronis

International Coach
All true of course, runs are runs and we can't boost his average just because he didn't knuckle down and convert some tons into doubles

However I think the fact he never scored a ton in a loss (I think) indicates that his centuries were impactful enough and often put his side into winning positions or at least unloseable ones

Helps that Slater, Taylor and his brother often contributed as well with tons of their own when he got one so him getting doubles was never really necessary for the team.

A 41 average looks like an underachievement due to his talent but there was no real downside to it results wise
I would’ve thought so too but apparently not.

 

Top