But surely you can see the unusual slant in many of Richard's views too? Not that everything he says is wrong, but I certainly can't agree with most of it.Rik said:But I fear it's in vein, Marc and Richard's disputes usually start in a thread about the subject before Richard mentions his views and Marc decides to teach him a lesson and suddenly they've gone massively off topic and oh no my headisgoingtoexplode....
I do, but I do see logic in them, even if it's on some wierd tangent. Being well known for similer "unusual" views by my friends, it would be wierd if I didn't root for Richard more. But, I also don't find the need to reply to every post to prove him wrong, or even right.Mr Mxyzptlk said:But surely you can see the unusual slant in many of Richard's views too? Not that everything he says is wrong, but I certainly can't agree with most of it.
And what would that accomplish aside from compounding matters?Armadillo said:You should make a poll tim.
Since this is on topic I might as well say it:Armadillo said:Well personally I think that Marc makes a lot more sense than Richard, (who I dont think knows a whole lot about cricket) You should make a poll tim.
Whereas Richard nev...Rik said:Marc ... mentioning only parts of averages to play it to his advantage.
The only instance I've seen him use that is with Ramprakash, which think is a very valid point because Ramprakash's opening experiment has in no way got anything to do with his generally poor record.Neil Pickup said:Whereas Richard nev...