You mean ODI batting right?Though i rated him quite highly as a captain, but i think the pressure of the job has really seemed to have started to effect his batting badly in recent times, and i think this decision has something to do in that regard.
Sanga would the man best suited for the job, but i have a feeling SLC might make the stupid decision of handing it over to Dilshan.
Well, he isn't getting the capaincy unless he scores a long overdue century with the bat eitherHe couldn't possibly be as crap a captain as Kumble.
When's he playing England next?Well, he isn't getting the capaincy unless he scores a long overdue century with the bat either![]()
Sanga can handle the media well, and deflect pressure away from the younger guys. I'm afraid Dilshan lacks the confidence to stick to his guns. And let's face it, SL are gonna have it tough for the next few years in both forms. Sanga seems more head strong and hopefully captaincy will elevate his batting like Ponting/Smith.Sanga to captain for me, with him giving up gloves in both forms of the game, but he hasnt had lot of actual captaincy experience most people are just going by the nature of the man.
Murali is a romantic thought but he hasnt got time.
Mahela Jayawardene's never been all that good a ODI batsman.You mean ODI batting right?
TBH I must admit I anticipated this move from him earlier itself (CBA to find the posts). Ever since 2007 WC, he's been struggling in ODIs and I thought he'd prefer test captaincy to a spot in ODIs and retire from ODIs altogether. However, I guess he's decided to give himself one more chance to excel in the ODIs, and gave upon test captaincy as well.Mahela Jayawardene's never been all that good a ODI batsman.
Anyway,at him stepping-down from the captaincy, yeah. Completely out-of-the-blue, but then, that's not unheard of in Lankan circles.
In the modern age, only Fleming and Ponting have captained for longish terms. (TBF Smithy is going the same route). While I'd salute Fleming and at the same time maintain that he was perhaps the best batsman during his time, which made him cling to it despite NZ's moderate run in tests and good run in ODIs.I don't think the feelings of shock/disappointment/anger being exhibited by some posters are justified.
"I didn't see much difference in Ganguly's leadership .... He has made a difference to India as captain but it may well be time for a change as captains do run out of ideas and definitely have a shelf life."
Ian Chappell on Saurav Ganguly, in 2004
"There is a shelf life to captaincy in India in which you can give it your best. May be the shelf life is becoming shorter as time goes by"
Rahul Dravid, after resigning from the Indian captaincy in 2007
“...You grow stale. You need fresh thinking and a different approach after a while. Once others get used to your style and things fall into a pattern, it can become monotonous."
Mahela Jayawardene, October 2008
It does seem that it takes a particular type of introspective personality (Dravid, Jayawardene) to figure this out and more importantly, act on it. The ability to wean oneself of a position of power, something that a polar opposite like Ganguly wouldn't consider. Anyone think the concept of a captaincy shelf-life is peculiar to the subcontinental culture, or does it apply to all teams (hint*Ponting*)?