• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Lara v Tendulkar ................. at fielding

Stapel

International Regular
Lara took more than twice as many catches per Test, compared to Tendulkar. I won't argue you can simply judge the fielding capacity of a player by number of catches, but more than twice as many...., that seals it, not?
 

smash84

The Tiger King
not really. How many of the bowler's in Tendulkar's team were producing catches for the fieldsmen? Nowhere near as many as Curtly and Courtney were producing for WI
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lara took more than twice as many catches per Test, compared to Tendulkar. I won't argue you can simply judge the fielding capacity of a player by number of catches, but more than twice as many...., that seals it, not?
Dravid was the primary slip fielder. Tendulkar wasn't. He was pretty quick and committed himself in the field a bit more than Lara, probably and had a great throwing arm pre injury. Lara was simply a better slipper, overall both good
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
not really. How many of the bowler's in Tendulkar's team were producing catches for the fieldsmen? Nowhere near as many as Curtly and Courtney were producing for WI
Dravid took plenty but he was always in the slips where he gobbled up virtually anything catchable. Tendulkar fielded in a variety of positions. It's obvious he'd have less catches than a regular slip fielder
 
Last edited:

Top