Lara/Ambrose vs Ponting/McGrath

[akilana]

Yeah, Ambrose pre surgery was the equal to of not McGrath's superior.

Career overall, McGrath just a touch above.

mcgrath gets overrated a lot here. He wasn't that penetrative in Asia and wasn't excellent vs SA like he was against most other teams. SA had a good batting line up but it's not anywhere near Aus.. people give him a pass for no reason.

 

[Johan]

mcgrath gets overrated a lot here. He wasn't that penetrative in Asia and wasn't excellent vs SA like he was against most other teams. SA had a good batting line up but it's not anywhere near Aus.. people give him a pass for no reason.

Asia is really not a point for Ambrose against McGrath

 

[subshakerz]

mcgrath gets overrated a lot here. He wasn't that penetrative in Asia and wasn't excellent vs SA like he was against most other teams. SA had a good batting line up but it's not anywhere near Aus.. people give him a pass for no reason.

Ambrose was even less penetrative in Pakistan, untested in India/SC and worse in SA.

 

[akilana]

Asia is really not a point for Ambrose against McGrath

i wasn't comparing them in my post.

 

[akilana]

Ambrose was even less penetrative in Pakistan, untested in India/SC and worse in SA.

bradman wasn't tested in asia either..

worse in SA? you sure? lol

 

[subshakerz]

bradman wasn't tested in asia either..

worse in SA? you sure? lol

Yes Ambrose was worse.

McGrath had three series, one poor one early career followed by two excellent ones in his prime.

Ambrose had a moderate series at best in his prime in which he was outbowled by Donald, Pollock and Walsh.

 

[akilana]

Yes Ambrose was worse.

McGrath had three series, one poor one early career followed by two excellent ones in his prime.

Ambrose had a moderate series at best in his prime in which he was outbowled by Donald, Pollock and Walsh.

you're wrong. both were equal in SA. I guess you just make up stuffs on the go.

 

[subshakerz]

you're wrong. both were equal in SA. I guess you just make up stuffs on the go.

Please check the actual series and tell me how I am wrong. McGrath was excellent in 96 and 2001 there. Ambrose was a disappointment masked by a low average but less wickets.

 

[akilana]

Please check the actual series and tell me how I am wrong. McGrath was excellent in 96 and 2001 there. Ambrose was a disappointment masked by a low average but less wickets.

wrong again. Check and let me know.

 

[subshakerz]

wrong again. Check and let me know.

I did. Did you?

 

[akilana]

I did. Did you?

I did. you didn't

 

[OverratedSanity]

Truly high IQ arguments on display here folks

 

[subshakerz]

Truly high IQ arguments on display here folks

I'm trying to meet him at his level and I am being exceedingly patient.

 

[Johan]

This reminds me of Oblivion NPC conversations

 

[honestbharani]

Truly high IQ arguments on display here folks

A post that is universal for the PC subforum or any thread salty posts in, unfortunately.

 

[subshakerz]

A post that is universal for the PC subforum or any thread salty posts in, unfortunately.

Like you are literally stalking these threads, not adding anything to the chat, only to post when someone comments about me. Kinda creepy.

 

[honestbharani]

Ironic salt or Salty Irony?

 

[sayon basak]

This reminds me of Oblivion NPC conversations

You watch minecraft?

 

[Johan]

You watch minecraft?

what? No! that's oblivion

 

[Sliferxxxx]

Yes Ambrose was worse.

McGrath had three series, one poor one early career followed by two excellent ones in his prime.

Ambrose had a moderate series at best in his prime in which he was outbowled by Donald, Pollock and Walsh.

Did you just say Ambrose was in his prime? What the hell is wrong with you:

"The West Indies are also worried about Curtly Ambrose - at 35, another veteran who is also suffering.

Ambrose has been suffering for some time from an injured left knee, and according to Waight, it is getting worse each day." This was pre South Africa series. He missed the final test as a result.