But is that the issue? I read it that he makes more money in county cricket and misc t20's than he would playing for Zimbabwe (if he gets paid) so he doesn't want to be available for Zimbabwe duties because it means he misses out on CC and t20 payments while he's away playing for Zim.Can't blame the boy, really.
I do think it's maybe time for the ICC to have another look at what constitutes "domestic" players tho. If a chap has a British or EU passport (as I'm imagining Jarvis must) I don't think we'd be losing too much by letting them play over here as non-overseas players whilst remaining available for their countries of birth and/or upbringing.
Works ok in football and, to a lesser extent, rugby too.
Nah, he's just CW's Zimbabwe version of Brockley, good to have around.You a travel agent?
Very trueEven if he doesn't make it in county cricket, his prospects of living in the UK and finding a career outside cricket would be better than returning to Zimbabwe.
Correction! Test Cricket in Zimbabwe is ****ed...Test cricket is ****ed.
I dunno the specifics of the Jarvis case, but if he wants to be style himself as an Azhar Mahmood styley T20 gun for hire a county career is more likely to stop him playing in the various and assorted T20 tournaments than his Zim duties would, I'd guess.But is that the issue? I read it that he makes more money in county cricket and misc t20's than he would playing for Zimbabwe (if he gets paid) so he doesn't want to be available for Zimbabwe duties because it means he misses out on CC and t20 payments while he's away playing for Zim.
He's pretty cut up, can confirm he has opened a bottle of port from 1964This thread is lacking a PEWS response