Are you gonna call him Daddy now?You sound just like my parents
man of the match performances is a meaningless metricDid Hogg win even 1 man of the match performance in 2003/07 WC ? I feel Aus would have won 2003/07 WC even if any of CW members would have been their lead spinner
Why I brought it up is because of the English you spoke, in your post that I replied to initially, you said that Kuldeep Yadav has already achieved what Hoggs has achieved in his entire career. According to the dictionary achieved means to successfully bring about or reach (a desired objective or result) by effort, skill, or courage...Kuldeep Yadav has not achieved any tournament victory so it is false to say he has achieved what Hogg has achieved in his career. Achievements is something you have done or not irrespective of quality.Why do you bring WC win while comparing player. WC is won by a team and it has nothing to do with a player calliber.
SO according to u SREESANTH> CURTLY AMBROSE OR DALE STEYN OR RICHARD HADLEE
And to counter your second point Kuldeep was at his lowest in 2019 and 2020 and he has worked on himself and now he is a completely different bolwer. Just wait and watch his wc records this year.
I was talking about his personal records. And yes he went past Brad Hogg tally of wickets with similar average and better strike rate. Winning a WC for any player can be a cherry in a cake but you can't bring out it as a parameter to judge a player's performance. So many great players couldn't win a world cup but some mediocre players actually won. So it depends on the team as a whole not on a respective player calliber. The only point which actually makes sense is Hogg performance in world cup. Yeah that can be a context on which we can discuss.Why I brought it up is because of the English you spoke, in your post that I replied to initially, you said that Kuldeep Yadav has already achieved what Hoggs has achieved in his entire career. According to the dictionary achieved means to successfully bring about or reach (a desired objective or result) by effort, skill, or courage...Kuldeep Yadav has not achieved any tournament victory so it is false to say he has achieved what Hogg has achieved in his career. Achievements is something you have done or not irrespective of quality.
It's great how comparing average and strike rate are flawless metrics because every player has played the exact same games against the exact same opposition in the exact same conditions in the exact same circumstances as every other playerI was talking about his personal records. And yes he went past Brad Hogg tally of wickets with similar average and better strike rate. Winning a WC for any player can be a cherry in a cake but you can't bring out it as a parameter to judge a player's performance. So many great players couldn't win a world cup but some mediocre players actually won. So it depends on the team as a whole not on a respective player calliber. The only point which actually makes sense is Hogg performance in world cup. Yeah that can be a context on which we can discuss.
This. Plus a quicker action makes him difficult to pick.I don't think he was "figured out". He didn't introduce any mystery balls that needed figuring out. He just lost control and confidence IMO.
he already had his challenge story arc dude now its time for him to shine in the climaxI am really worried about Kuldeep in the remaining WC after this thread .
Never hype a player whose career isn’t finished.
Yeah that what i meant to say,that even if he wasn't there it made no changes to Aus chance of winning games.Did Hogg win even 1 man of the match performance in 2003/07 WC ? I feel Aus would have won 2003/07 WC even if any of CW members would have been their lead spinner
Yeah that's just very, very wrongYeah that what i meant to say,that even if he wasn't there it made no changes to Aus chance of winning games.
I don't think so in 2003 even the absence of Warne and Darren Lehmann doesn't rattled the Aussie. I don't think Hogg absence was a major threat for them. Any other spinner would have done the work for them. Warne just played in 1999 wc winning squad but still they won the other two just because of their resources.Yeah that's just very, very wrong
Mate I lived through this and you couldn't be more wrong. Hogg was immense for that teamI don't think so in 2003 even the absence of Warne and Darren Lehmann doesn't rattled the Aussie. I don't think Hogg absence was a major threat for them. Any other spinner would have done the work for them. Warne just played in 1999 wc winning squad but still they won the other two just because of their resources.
Mate I barely watch ODI’s but even I know WC’s matter.Yeah because he has already achieved what Hogg achieved in his entire career. Now as Kuldeep has a lot of games left, he will past go him to become the greatest chinaman.
The thread says ODI bowler, not world cup performer ("world cup bowler" would be an absurd concept), so this oft repeated "only world cups matter" trope doesn't belong here.Given that the WC is the only meaningful odi tournament then this is a clear win for Hogg. No one really cares about players go in jamodis.
And based on their WC form I say Hogg is the better odi bowler because jamodis have very little weight in the matter. I explained that in my previous post which you seem to have misunderstood to build your fallacious arguments on “tropes”.The thread says ODI bowler, not world cup performer ("world cup bowler" would be an absurd concept), so this oft repeated "only world cups matter" trope doesn't belong here.