Piper
International Captain
That's why they only just beat Tonga and USANah, South Africa had been better than England throughout the tournament. You're severly underrating them.
That's why they only just beat Tonga and USANah, South Africa had been better than England throughout the tournament. You're severly underrating them.
They trashed England 36-0 in pool play.That's why they only just beat Tonga and USA
It's easy enough to say England at their peak were better than South Africa throughout the whole tournament, and it's true. But through the whole tournament South Africa were better, and they were better during the final and deserved to win. In reality England played two good games.Yeah, but look how badly England were playing at that stage.. SA have been lucky in a lot of their matches.
Can't agree with that - England stepped up superbly when it mattered against both Australia and France, and full credit to them for both matches. But I don't think you can possibly say they were a better rugby team than England over the course of this tournament. 37 tries to 12 for the tournament tells the story - while number of tries scored isn't by any means the only criteria a team should be judged on, such a discrepancy as that is notable.Have to agree here. I think the 3rd/4th Play Off was a million times better than the actual Final. And South Africa being the best team in the WC? I don't think so. Once Enland starting playing (especially against Aus) they were better than SA have been all WC. And I think if los Pumas had played against SA the way they played against France, I don't think SA would have won.
OT, but where are you going and why?..was exciting,cos i wanted them to win so badly...would have liked that memory of them holding the cup just as i leave England,but wasnt to be...have enjoyed the whole thing tho,tbh..watched quite a few decent games of rugby over the past few weeks...
USA. Can't recall her saying why though.OT, but where are you going and why?
Indeed. They were the best throughout the tournament and also one of the best over the last couple of years. Very deserving winner.The World Cup got its deserved champions.
Complete tosh, but I will not pay too much heed to it.SA have been lucky in a lot of their matches.
Nah, just wearing an eyepatch.I must have been watching a different World Cup to everyone else then
I know it's hard to believe, but the Cricket World Cup did finally end up finishing.I must have been watching a different World Cup to everyone else then
You missed a true classic.I must have been watching a different World Cup to everyone else then
Can't use the 'oh i'm blonde' excuse and have people thinking you're Stephen Hawking.Why is everyone treating me like an idiot? All I said was that I didn't think that South Africa were the best team in the World Cup. Whether they were not is everyone's opinion. I just think that there were teams who played better. They won the World Cup with my opinion of them not being the best team, but they won. Congratulations to them.
Because you've been known to make silly statements in the past. South Africa were better than England, who really only performed well in two, maybe three games.Why is everyone treating me like an idiot? All I said was that I didn't think that South Africa were the best team in the World Cup. Whether they were not is everyone's opinion. I just think that there were teams who played better. They won the World Cup with my opinion of them not being the best team, but they won. Congratulations to them.
Really can't agree there. It was effective, but it was as ugly as anything came up with, save for their efforts in the bronze match. & It's obviously easier to be brave in that than the final.It's OK Piper... South Africa weren' t the best side at the World Cup and didn't play great rugby. Argentina played the best rugby, IMO, and NZ, Australia and France would've all won if they'd been on SA's side of the draw.
I admit that England played crap in the pool stages, but when it really mattered they played well. I think that South Africa only ever went through a few 'gears'. They weren't the side that we had seen earlier in the year.Because you've been known to make silly statements in the past. South Africa were better than England, who really only performed well in two, maybe three games.
Finally, someone who gets what I'm trying to say!It's OK Piper... South Africa weren' t the best side at the World Cup and didn't play great rugby. Argentina played the best rugby, IMO, and NZ, Australia and France would've all won if they'd been on SA's side of the draw.