Maybe because he is NZ's best batI was wondering why Taylor was protecting him by batting at 3. And now I know why.
Hand in your supporters card. Now. We'll have your Hay and Sinclair ones while you're at it.Haha well he's got my support, so that's a bad sign.
They have to keep him, what other top order batting options do they have in the squad... Ingram? I'm sure he'll play every game. I hope he can pass fifty in one of his next two innings, just to settle his nerves.Another Duck. I hope they keep him for the whole tournament at least.
Maybe I should just start supporting Northern Districts.Shot Howsie.
Hand in your supporters card. Now. We'll have your Hay and Sinclair ones while you're at it.
Meanwhile, I'm going to draft a list for you to support. Gareth Hopkins, Chris Martin and Jeetan Patel to start with. More soon.
That would be an incredibly poor move. His game isn't set up to bat at 6 at all (though, neither is Grant Elliott's), he doesn't have a power game and he would inevitably get out cheaply (or use up too many balls and then people would be criticising for different reasons).I would say that since it is only Ingram waiting in the wings - that he will get the tri series. But he could be demoted down the order to number 6 to take the pressure off him.
Well you'd hope so, it would be very poor management if you were to drop him especially with no better batsmen sitting on the sidelines. Martin Crowe said after they selected him for that second test against Australia that once you pick Williamson you stick with him no matter what, which is absolutely right for mine. They pulled the trigger on his international career so to speak, they now have to live with the consequences of doing so, which sadly enough hasn't started how everyone thought and wanted it too.Could be worse - he could Attapatu it,
Surely he'll get the tri series. Then they'll reassess?
Who are the others? Im pretty sure Williamson has had the most hype around him since Ive been watchingHah! I knew he was ****. He and Hay should get together sometime to swap notes on bullying undermanned opponents.
Seriously though, people need to stop panicking about him so much. He'll probably come good eventually, and even on the improbable chance that he doesn't, it's hardly like he'd be the first "next Martin Crowe" to be a disappointment.
Yeah I like this post. I think there is an adjustment period to get used to international cricket. You also have to factor in the concept of playing on TV and in front of a big crowd for the first time as well.Well you'd hope so, it would be very poor management if you were to drop him especially with no better batsmen sitting on the sidelines. Martin Crowe said after they selected him for that second test against Australia that once you pick Williamson you stick with him no matter what, which is absolutely right for mine. They pulled the trigger on his international career so to speak, they now have to live with the consequences of doing so, which sadly enough hasn't started how everyone thought and wanted it too.
FTR this isn't new for Williamson, he made 0 and 1 in his first-class debut and only scored something like 20 odd runs during his first four one day games for ND. Perhaps he's just a slow starter.
What was actually predicted of Craig McMillan if you can remember? Was it just the usual "The next Crowe" "The potential to be New Zealand's greatest ever batsmen"? I remember my primary school cricket coach use to hate him and would go on rants about how he's just a big fat waste of talent (only starting because everyone wanted to adopt the McMillan stance at the time). His domestic record wasn't anywhere near as good as Williamson's was over the first two years of his career, although he did pick up some massive runs in his third year.If you go back a few more years, Craig McMillan. Had a decent career, but nowhere near what was predicted.