PlayerComparisons
International Captain
Two Ashes Legends
Lillee is by no means a “certified top 5” pacer, there is relatively little consensus on top pacers compared to other disciplines.This is just silly. Anderson is not a GREAT bowler. He is very good but his huge haul of wickets is only a function of longevity and the fact that England play so much cricket. Lillee is a certified top 5 ever pacer.
Please find me credible experts who leave him out of a top five greatest pacers list. Thanks.Lillee is by no means a “certified top 5” pacer, there is relatively little consensus on top pacers compared to other disciplines.
What makes someone a credible expert? Are they a media presence, a writer, or a former player (who’s usually biased)?Please find me credible experts who leave him out of a top five greatest pacers list. Thanks.
ftr, this is how CW ended up voting last yearPlease find me credible experts who leave him out of a top five greatest pacers list. Thanks.
@CartyDurham you may be interestedThis is just silly. Anderson is not a GREAT bowler. He is very good but his huge haul of wickets is only a function of longevity and the fact that England play so much cricket. Lillee is a certified top 5 ever pacer.
No comment@CartyDurham you may be interested
Its ok I already posted for you.No comment
I’m on strict orders to not get involved so I’m not
AnDeRsOn HaS tHe MoSt WiCkEtS oF AnY PaCe BoWlEr
Anderson can only get wickets in Eng. Average of 30 in asia , 34 in aus , more than 30 in SA. So he struggled everywhere.ftr, this is how CW ended up voting last year
CW's Top 40 Pace Bowlers: 2022 Results
Once again, thanks to all involved in the voting and comments on this thread. Here is the final 40 together with relevant figures such as bowling average, strike rate, economy rate and wickets per match. I included the last of these as it is an indication of how important a component of a team's...www.cricketweb.net
Well let us define it as acknowledged experts on the game: be that writers, coaches or players. Peer review is the greatest accolade of course.What makes someone a credible expert? Are they a media presence, a writer, or a former player (who’s usually biased)?
Incorrect. Public polls on cricketweb dot net dot forum are the greatest accolade.Well let us define it as acknowledged experts on the game: be that writers, coaches or players. Peer review is the greatest accolade of course.
who hands out these acknowledgements to these so called experts and what makes them worthyWell let us define it as acknowledged experts on the game: be that writers, coaches or players. Peer review is the greatest accolade of course.
Credibility is earned over years as with anything. You perform or make credible analysis (backed by facts) long enough and you earn credibility. Not too hard a concept.who hands out these acknowledgements to these so called experts and what makes them worthy