kyear2
Hall of Fame Member
Would heavily dispute that, but to each their own.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Jacques Kallis vs Keith Miller
- Thread starter subshakerz
- Start date
shortpitched713
Cricketer Of The Year
So to me, this is a question of if Hadlee, Imran, Sobers, Shaun Pollock are all selected by other draft managers, which all-rounder do I pick first.
Based on their records I think I'm very, very happy with Kallis having a top 6 batting position, I think I might have a question in my mind about one of my main 4 bowling positions going to Miller, so marginally I would go Kallis.
Based on their records I think I'm very, very happy with Kallis having a top 6 batting position, I think I might have a question in my mind about one of my main 4 bowling positions going to Miller, so marginally I would go Kallis.
Fuller Pilch
Hall of Fame Member
Glenn Phillips
sayon basak
Cricketer Of The Year
Kallis.
sayon basak
Cricketer Of The Year
So, Hammond>Miller>Kallis as overall cricketers for you?
Johan
Cricketer Of The Year
I think I voted for Miller over Hammond didn't I?
sayon basak
Cricketer Of The Year
I forgot sorry.
Johan
Cricketer Of The Year
I view Miller and Hammond as perfect equals I think, Kinda like Warne and Murali, or Ponting and Kallis (batting)
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I have decided to switch my vote to Kallis now. I now consider him the 3rd best AR.
DrWolverine
International Regular
Why?
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I have reevaluated his bowling.
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Basically since he had a long career it's fair to not use the last part as representative of his bowling.
And the first part he was a good seamer/swinger roughly comparable with the other first changers but was only held back by bowling load.
I still think Imran and Sobers were better in their secondary disciplines but I think Kallis bowling is roughly where I would say Kapil's batting is.
And the first part he was a good seamer/swinger roughly comparable with the other first changers but was only held back by bowling load.
I still think Imran and Sobers were better in their secondary disciplines but I think Kallis bowling is roughly where I would say Kapil's batting is.
Coronis
Hall of Fame Member
One step closer to second where he belongs
subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Lol I don't think so. But I am always willing to re-evalutate.