Demolition Man
State Vice-Captain
It certainly explains alot.archie mac said:Heaven help us
It certainly explains alot.archie mac said:Heaven help us
Well it did end at like 4am Australian time.Top_Cat said:This game =
Easy. Run fests on a flat wicket end up being pretty pointless affairs. Some of us like our cricket with a bit of depth and hitting the ball to or over the fence is a small part of the game. Games like this basically reduce the role of the bowler to near pitching machine level and that's boring. Boundaries roped-in and ultra-flat pitches just turn the game into a six-hitting contest. American League authorities did the same thing to baseball by juicing the balls, changing the rules on diet supplements and allowing previously-banned alterations to bats. It greatly affected the game (baseball has never been less popular in the states) and killed-off your Ty Cobb-style 'place the ball and leg it to first-base to set up a strategic position' players, replacing them with giant cavemen who could just hit real hard.I think it was the best game of cricket ever. How can you say it was boring?
The only part I can disagree with here. I doubt you, nor anyone who witnessed it, will forget it.Top_Cat said:This match will wow people for about a fortnight then be forgotten, unlike the aforementioned Ashes series.
But surely thats just what Twenty20 is?archie mac said:It must be just me? I thought that just about the worst game of cricket I have ever watched
Why not just hire a bowling machine and pitch the ball where the batsman wants it and see how many sixes they can hit.
If that is the way ODI cricket is going, wake me up when the Test Matches start
Yes, but at least that lasts 2.5 hours, not 7.Langeveldt said:But surely thats just what Twenty20 is?
It was flat, but not that flat.Dasa said:It's not just you. After the initial shock of seeing so many runs, it just gets boring seeing fours and sixes over and over. Bowlers have no chance with the conditions the way they are.
You underestimate the sheer overwhelming force of my apathy towards ODI's.The only part I can disagree with here. I doubt you, nor anyone who witnessed it, will forget it.
That's fair enough.Top_Cat said:You underestimate the sheer overwhelming force of my apathy towards ODI's.
What I hope is that, after a while (say another 4 or 5 years) of scoring like we've seen the last 5 years, more people might realise that.Dasa said:It's not just you. After the initial shock of seeing so many runs, it just gets boring seeing fours and sixes over and over.
Where are you quoting form Richard?Richard said:What I hope is that, after a while (say another 4 or 5 years) of scoring like we've seen the last 5 years, more people might realise that.
Then maybe we'll get people clamouring to play on dirt. "Why are we seeing all these 30 and 40 all-outs? The crowds want to see stumps flying and batsmen hopping all over? That wasn't a good one-day wicket, it was too high-scoring".