and how many of those happen to be part of the same attack?its amazing how you put 4 quality bowlers like as though they were part of a foursome. and perhaps you havent even taken into account the pitches that they've bowled to tendulkar on when he score those centuries.Sanz said:
yes i was impressed when he smacked cameron cuffy,dillon,black and SANFORD all over the parkSanz said:
in the same way if their bowling was that bad(with 2 quality bowlers)wouldnt teams abroad always score 700 runs against them?marc71178 said:
read this:marc71178 said:
dont see how a bunch of centuries against all the teams when india have one proves that he isnt a choker. and then you said "so his centuries are effective most of the time"...again does this prove that he isnt a choker....im sorry but this has no relevance to this thread unless you're trying to prove to me that tendulkar is a great odi batsman.(a point that im familiar with)Sehwag309 said:
so would you happen to call this so and so who fails to get wickets in non seaming conditions as "great"??then i totally agree with you and matthew hoggard is also great!Sehwag309 said:
have i ever said that he shouldnt be in the 11?or that he isnt a good player?no my point is that he isnt great and his average is about 10 runs more than it deserves to be. tendulkar is a good batsman and believe it or not if i were an indian selector hed be the first person in my team.Sehwag309 said:
sry wrong link....try thisWaughney said:
..So are u finishing the sentences or starting a new book. I like your style of saying "bunch of centuries:, as if it was something in the bangalore fish market.tooextracool said:
again i dont see you're point here....ive never doubted that he isnt a great ODI player so i dont see any reason why you should absurd statements like these. if you're waiting for me to say that hes the best ODI batsman in the game or a great test batsman well then you better lie down.Sehwag309 said:
shhh you'll wake up eclipseWaughney said:
Okay Edwards & Co. are definately better than Donald, Pollock, Klusener or Mcgrath, Lee, Gillespie, Warnie or Wasim,Waqar,Saqlain or Ambrose, Walsh.tooextracool said:
No you were not, But it seems you were greatly impressed when Thorpe was smacking around Edwards & Co.tooextracool said:
No, that would be 'A shoal of centuries'.Sehwag309 said:
Wy dont you try this :- http://statserver.cricket.org/guru/...edhigh=;csearch=;submit=1;.cgifields=viewtypetooextracool said:
And in last few years(Since 2000) How many finals he has played Outside the subcontinent where India has chased a score > 230 ?? My guess is not more than 5.Waughney said:
Really ?? He worked hard for every one of his runs, It wasn't gifted to him on a silver platter. Who the **** are you to declare that he doesn't deserve this average. It's very easy for jealous folks like you who dont know how to hold a bat to make stupid remarks like that. It's okay that you feel he is a choker but to say that he doesn't deserve his average is highly stupid.tooextracool said:
. But , Only if you had a batsmen like him.
