True, overlly nice people are very sinisterIt's NZ, it should always be NZ. No one likes painfully nice people. If Canada played cricket I'd vote for them, but in their absence, it's NZ. Take your niceness and **** off.
True, overlly nice people are very sinisterIt's NZ, it should always be NZ. No one likes painfully nice people. If Canada played cricket I'd vote for them, but in their absence, it's NZ. Take your niceness and **** off.
Nothing sinister about New Zealand, the way they handled that 2019 WC final with such grace and poise showed that they are legit good peopleTrue, overlly nice people are very sinister
That was just weaknessNothing sinister about New Zealand, the way they handled that 2019 WC final with such grace and poise showed that they are legit good people
When you're beaten fair and square it's the only way to be.Nothing sinister about New Zealand, the way they handled that 2019 WC final with such grace and poise showed that they are legit good people
I would say maturityThat was just weakness
You referring to the tied final that undeniably should have culminated in NZ winning?Nothing sinister about New Zealand, the way they handled that 2019 WC final with such grace and poise showed that they are legit good people
My countryman Kumar Dharmasena got a very big decision wrong in the final over , the deflection off Stokes bat should have been 5 runs instead of 6 because Stokes did not cross for the second run before the ball went to the boundary , in such a close game that matters, but NZ did not abuse Dharmasena at any point after the match ..You referring to the tied final that undeniably should have culminated in NZ winning?
I myself, yes, always accepted that result as it came and think that while there were some minor irregularities, England were ultimately deserved to be winners. And after all, it is only sport.
BCCI surely?Wrong answers only
Tell us more about this farmeraders like Cummins, who is probably my favourite Aussie ever after a farmer who i met in Budapest travelling, set the tone for that.
Maturity is for wussesI would say maturity
If twitter is anything to go by then half the country not just Shri.Imagine Imagine IMAGINE if we retained the WC in India
I’d actually worry about Shri
What's wrong with SA?India for me personally England play entertaining style of cricket and more Likable than India or south Africa.
Wagner spends a decade breaking people's ****ing arms and NZ get labelled 'nice' because they don't say rude words to their opponents in the middle. Cricket's priorities are kinda ****ed, huh?It's NZ, it should always be NZ. No one likes painfully nice people. If Canada played cricket I'd vote for them, but in their absence, it's NZ. Take your niceness and **** off.
SA has a long standing reputation amongst certain Aus fans as playing really dour cricket. Generally seen amongst people whose opinions were set in concrete by about 2006.What's wrong with SA?
Fair enough. They are my 3rd favourite team behind NZ and SL (Windies 4th) though.SA has a long standing reputation amongst certain Aus fans as playing really dour cricket. Generally seen amongst people whose opinions were set in concrete by about 2006.
No! England are the smallest bunch of non-cheats I've never seenWrong answers only