I bathe in champagne every day and the novelty still hasn't worn off.mavric41 said:Because it takes the things out of cricket that are special and makes it common place. Its the same reason you don't have champagne or filet mignon everyday. Sooner or later you get sick of it and go to something else.
There are so many lines I could use about Kiwis and sheep with your answer, but I won't.Fiery said:I bathe in champagne every day and the novelty still hasn't worn off.
Go ahead!Fiery said:I'll take off I reckon
Whoops missed the t. Silly me. I'll give myself an uppercut. Ouch! That really hurt!_Ed_ said:Go ahead!
Anyway...I hope it doesn't replace 50 over cricket, really love 50 over games.
Bring em on skippy!mavric41 said:There are so many lines I could use about Kiwis and sheep with your answer, but I won't.
Well that's a lie. Kiwis can't read.Fiery said:I just read an article in Time magazine which did a random survey of people from around the world that showed that Australians are considered "ugly" and "stupid" compared to New Zealanders. Wasn't sure if the results of the survey really prove anything but it's a pretty well-respected magazine.
Yes lets all bow down to your omniscient judgement of whether a game is 'better' than another format, lets completely ignore the full houses and the extra kids in the street who'll get interested in the game because you are 'The One'. I take it you're also the sort of person who turns off then when a side is 6/7 wickets down in case he sees a 'slog', or if it's the last 10 overs of an ODI, or if you need 170 off 40 overs in a Test match...Arrow said:If it does become the new OD cricket it will be because of the sports administrators greed and not because its a better game because its not. It cheapens everything thats great about cricket and it lacks any depth which is one of crickets great stengths. Its a mindless game.
So popularity is indicative of quality? I guess you also think mcdonalds is tasty and friends was a funny comedy. Mass market appeal usually means something is pretty shitty, and i dont remember cricket having problems with popularity to start with or kids taking up the game.Scaly piscine said:Yes lets all bow down to your omniscient judgement of whether a game is 'better' than another format, lets completely ignore the full houses and the extra kids in the street who'll get interested in the game because you are 'The One'. I take it you're also the sort of person who turns off then when a side is 6/7 wickets down in case he sees a 'slog', or if it's the last 10 overs of an ODI, or if you need 170 off 40 overs in a Test match...
No, because 20-over games are not one-day games.brett1989 said:is 20/20 the new oneday Cricket