• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

IR Bell pretty little fifties thread

So Stokes’ fifty had intent in it- good in the context of the innings

Root’s was immaculate (save for the LBW decision that we didn’t review, 3 reds FFS!)

Jamie Smith’s was absolutely brilliant, he took the game away from us and expertly negotiated the short ball barrage.
 

Ali TT

International Vice-Captain
Stokes and Root obviously rescued England from a dire position but both did get out when still behind and the opportunity there to push on. Stokes has a general lack of application issue, lots of starts over recent years but few big innings and plenty of poor dismissals. But guess that's another topic. Root will always get a mention on here whenever he doesn't convert because it's just such an intrinsic feature of his career.

More personally I feel that while test centuries aren't rare, they're still special so when opportunities to witness one are lost my feelings range from sadness and disappointment (Smith getting a grubber on 95), frustration (Root again!!) to annoyance (Stokes "it's just the way he plays").
 

Chin Music

State Vice-Captain
Stokes and Root obviously rescued England from a dire position but both did get out when still behind and the opportunity there to push on. Stokes has a general lack of application issue, lots of starts over recent years but few big innings and plenty of poor dismissals. But guess that's another topic. Root will always get a mention on here whenever he doesn't convert because it's just such an intrinsic feature of his career.

More personally I feel that while test centuries aren't rare, they're still special so when opportunities to witness one are lost my feelings range from sadness and disappointment (Smith getting a grubber on 95), frustration (Root again!!) to annoyance (Stokes "it's just the way he plays").
Is it that unreasonable to see a lack of ruthlessness by individual players?It is unfair on Smith in this instance but far less so on Stokes who was careless. I was out and about later on so I missed Root etc.
 

Chin Music

State Vice-Captain
How pretty was Bavuma's 70?
Sounds like he had a fair bit of luck without watching. More than anything though, he more than anyone else has gouged out a respectable test career (36 av) without being prone to kick on and score big. Only 2 tons (22 non-converted 50s) in his entire career of 60 matches. He is no great talent, but a battler.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Sounds like he had a fair bit of luck without watching. More than anything though, he more than anyone else has gouged out a respectable test career (36 av) without being prone to kick on and score big. Only 2 tons (22 non-converted 50s) in his entire career of 60 matches. He is no great talent, but a battler.
Bavuma's definitely not making the most out of his talent with his conversion rate.
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
Sounds like he had a fair bit of luck without watching. More than anything though, he more than anyone else has gouged out a respectable test career (36 av) without being prone to kick on and score big. Only 2 tons (22 non-converted 50s) in his entire career of 60 matches. He is no great talent, but a battler.
Dropped early and then there was the caught off a no ball. But after that thought he batted really well, and given the carnage that followed, that 70 is looking like a double ton now.
 

Top