You don't mind seeing test cricket killed off then? As long as the Ashes is still around?
Also read the title of the thread.
You don't mind seeing test cricket killed off then? As long as the Ashes is still around?
Agreed. Trying to fit it all in is what's killing the game, not T20.
Test cricket alone cannot fund the game and retain top talent on a global scale. IPL has the cash and intervenes in the schedule only for a month or two in a year. It must be given a window and that should solve all problems. **** the ODIs.
Ah, yeah clearly I didn't read thread title or other posts properly.I didn't see anyone having a go at T20, just the IPL.
This
Wait until it kills off test cricket (other than the Ashes) totally... I give it about six years
Do you expect top talent to work on **** wages the National Board pays them then?I didn't see anyone having a go at T20, just the IPL.
No need to scrap ODI's. But 7 match ODI series should ceased to exist for sure.
Test cricket alone cannot fund the game and retain top talent on a global scale. IPL has the cash and intervenes in the schedule only for a month or two in a year. It must be given a window and that should solve all problems. **** the ODIs.
ODIs are occupying a lot of space and time in the International time table. If half of them was allocated to T20 including the IPL, it would not only guarantee a full window for IPL, but also ample rest time for players. The financial loss caused to member boards can easily be recuperated from the increased profits from the IPL. The ICC should levy a "royalty" from the IPL for ensuring seamless participation by players of other countries. Thus everyone profits and test cricket lives.No need to scrap ODI's. But 7 match ODI series should ceased to exist for sure.
I'm tired of hearing this flat point. (No personal offence to you though).ODIs are occupying a lot of space and time in the International time table. If half of them was allocated to T20 including the IPL, it would not only guarantee a full window for IPL, but also ample rest time for players. The financial loss caused to member boards can easily be recuperated from the increased profits from the IPL. The ICC should levy a "royalty" from the IPL for ensuring seamless participation by players of other countries. Thus everyone profits and test cricket lives.
Selecting players on the basis of ODIs is as justifiable as selecting them on the basis of T20s, perhaps except for the openers who stand a chance to play for more than 2 hours.I'm tired of hearing this flat point. (No personal offence to you though).
If you abandon ODI's what would happen to countries like outside AUS, ENG, SA who have very subs-standard FC competitions & inadvertently select players based on ODI form into test cricket. Surely you don't want be selecting players based on T20 form for test matches?
If you abandon ODI's what would happen to countries like outside AUS, ENG, SA who have very subs-standard FC competitions & inadvertently select players based on ODI form into test cricket. Surely you don't want be selecting players based on T20 form for test matches?
Good point...how on earth did cricketers live before the invention of the IPL?Do you expect top talent to work on **** wages the National Board pays them then?
Wonderful. Yeah they have to live in the 60s and 70s just because they play cricket? Grow up.Good point...how on earth did cricketers live before the invention of the IPL?
Good point...how on earth did cricketers live before the invention of the IPL?
You're kidding me right? The 60's and 70's? The IPL's been going for 2 years moron, I recall cricketers doing fine for a good decade before that.Wonderful. Yeah they have to live in the 60s and 70s just because they play cricket? Grow up.
Oh really? So then why they clamour for the commentary bozes, coaching jobs etc once they retire? And tell me cricketers who played in the past and are comfortably well off today? If am not mistaken, there are players who drive taxis to make a living.You're kidding me right? The 60's and 70's? The IPL's been going for 2 years moron, I recall cricketers doing fine for a good decade before that.
What the hell is bozes?Oh really? So then why they clamour for the commentary bozes, coaching jobs etc once they retire? And tell me cricketers who played in the past and are comfortably well off today? If am not mistaken, there are players who drive taxis to make a living.
And what is this "comfortable salary" that they get from the Board? If given a chance to earn more, why in the world should they not go for it? Just because they are players they cannot earn more than what their Board gives them? How ridiculous.
Quite a few cricketers have degrees, and FC cricketers here have "real" jobs. I know of two school teachers in the current CD first XI for instance, and one will probably join the openers merry go round for NZ if he keeps batting well.Oh really? So then why they clamour for the commentary bozes, coaching jobs etc once they retire? And tell me cricketers who played in the past and are comfortably well off today? If am not mistaken, there are players who drive taxis to make a living.
And what is this "comfortable salary" that they get from the Board? If given a chance to earn more, why in the world should they not go for it? Just because they are players they cannot earn more than what their Board gives them? How ridiculous.
Why they have to? They devoted a large part of their youth playing the game and hence have little other skills to take care of them post retirement. So since they invested so much in cricket, it is only natural that it provide them a near perennial source of income, That is what the humungous salaries offered by the IPL does. In one word "SAVINGS".What the hell is bozes?
Why wouldn't cricketers need jobs after they retire? They are no longer making money playing cricket, so of course they have to get another job. How ridiculous for you to think otherwise. The majority of international cricketers were making good money before the IPL ever came along, are you that much of a chump to think otherwise?
I never said they shouldn't try to earn more money. I simply agreed with someone who said the IPL could destroy test cricket.