Tony Blade
U19 Cricketer
Andy Atkins is overreacting, everyone knew[knows] that the Pakistani team[captain, manager, coach] wanted the grass to be cut off....atleast I did.
It is a wise man who heeds his own advice to others...thehellraiser said:so next time u post things that are degrading and disrespestful to the pakistani side ....just take a look at ur own bunch of cowards......
Not many of those on here today, marcmarc71178 said:It is a wise man who heeds his own advice to others...
Don't worry i just logged in :saint:luckyeddie said:Not many of those on here today, marc
Vish to the rescue..vishnureddy said:Don't worry i just logged in :saint:
vishnureddy said:Erm.. It succeeded in Multan but was nowhere near successful in Aus. If you think they were successful in Aus then for a person who is so ****y about Indian Cricket , you have set very low standards !!!!!
The wkt was a batting beauty, one guy score a tripple hundred, other got a near 200 while another svcored a 100, keeping that in mind Indian pacer did extremely well.Pathan didn't get a match haul of 5 wkts, but he was the one who was instrumental in Pak downfall.And keep in mind, Indian bowling has been weakened by the absence of Nehra and Bhajji, while the frontline pacer ZK has been half fit.Actually, that was basically Kumble in all honesty - Pathan took a few in Multan, but apart from that the strength isn't really there.
Yes, but that wasn't based on the bowling...wahindiawah said:To achieve a 1-1 draw in Australia was UNIMAGINABLE, and India did that.Remember, Australia is said to be one of the best side EVER, if India drew with them at their own backyard then its something of high standard rather than low!
Weakened by the absence of a bowler who averages about 40?wahindiawah said:Indian bowling has been weakened by the absence of Nehra and Bhajji, while the frontline pacer ZK has been half fit.
I see, so Austrlians lost the test match by getting out themselvesmarc71178 said:Yes, but that wasn't based on the bowling...
.
A few months back even Harmison was averaging very high.Weakened by the absence of a bowler who averages about 40?
I think its a norm not to judge a bowler by his average untill he has played atleast 20-25 test matches:rolleyes:Who's replaced him then - oh yes Balaji, who's just got his average under 100 again!
Who cares what you think? Noone thought India would win a test match in Aus, infact all people kept saying was that a whitewash was a certainty, yet India won the match.And Harbajhan isn't as effective as Kumble IMO - certainly don't think he'd have done as well in Australia.
You are crazy. :Owahindiawah said:(though i think India will save this test match).
Only one innings of below 350 in 4 tests and none below 275 in the onedayers :rolleyes: . Yeah great performance by the Indian bowlers :Pwahindiawah said:I see, so Austrlians lost the test match by getting out themselves
vishnureddy said:Only one innings of below 350 in 4 tests and none below 275 in the onedayers :rolleyes: . Yeah great performance by the Indian bowlers :P
Lions81 said:You are crazy. :O
At home...wahindiawah said:Harb has a better record against Aus
marc71178 said:At home...
His past away record 55 @ 37.43 may have a bearing there :Pwahindiawah said:Yes, but that doesn't maen he can't perform well against them away from home!
Past record counts for little, b/f this tour India had never won a OD series in Pakistan , but they did it this time.They never won a test match in Pak, but they did it this time.marc71178 said:His past away record 55 @ 37.43 may have a bearing there :P