Interesting user...

[KennyD]

Richard man...you're young, please dont do this to yourself, surely there is something better for you to do. Go chase some tail like a good lad now.

 

[Richard]

What do you suggest I do on this hot afternoon?
If you've got something better than click over the net, download a few tunes and watch some cricket I'd like to hear it.
And please don't tell me to go out and spend ten quid on petrol going for a drive.

 

[King_Ponting]

Hows about going to a pub and chatting up some chics?

 

[Nate]

Sub-woooofers.

 

[superkingdave]

does Neil actually have a brother called Andy?

 

[Neil Pickup]

does Neil actually have a brother called Andy?

Yes

 

[Magrat Garlick]

does Neil actually have a brother called Andy?

There was a lot of interesting stuff in this thread, but this one takes the cake...

If Rikki Clarke plays on the strength of an average half season I will support Australia as it will be the final straw for Surrey bias.

Gotcha!

Edit, even better:

Vaughan is pretty strong off the back-foot when the ball is short and wide but against a high standard opening attack like McGrath and Gillespie, I think he'll be found out. His back-foot bias was very obvious in the part of his innings I watched where he played mostly back-foot drives and when he did get onto the front-foot, it was only really a half-step forward.

And therein lies the problem. He doesn't transfer his weight to the front-foot fully and against slower swing bowlers such as Agarkar and Bagar, this won't be much of a problem but on bouncy tracks like in OZ against guys who hit the seam, I think he'll struggle.

 

[Neil Pickup]

There was a lot of interesting stuff in this thread, but this one takes the cake...



Gotcha!

Edit, even better:

With reference to the Ashes 2002-03. Which he didn't play in. So

 

[BoyBrumby]

why join a cricket forum?
http://forum.cricketweb.net/member.php?u=349

Gotta love that. This guy is such a moron he can't even type "cricket".

 

[Richard]

Hows about going to a pub and chatting up some chics?

Pubs are boring before about 7PM.
Anyway - can't go to pubs before work.

 

[Loony BoB]

We get some pretty good names over at EoFF as well. There's already a "loony bob kissed me" - although Dr Unne has the most parodies, including "Not At All Unne", "dr_unne_is_gay", "dr_unne_love_idol" and "dr_unne_banned_me". Other names include Horny Old Geezer, ihadsex, my.username.wants.instaban.co.m, suck my WANG, APE RAPE, buttsex, Penises can be big. and ****PALACE.COM. And then there's the normal old "ff sux" and so on, but you get used to them.

At least they make the staff's job easy.

 

[Richard]

at all those ones listed by Towns, and x 50 (I seriously laughed so hard I almost puked on reading this-'un) at Smith here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Welcome to our newest member, Bumbasher

Oh Bumbasher, we hardly knew ye.

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

Oh dear Bumbasher. We'll meet again in Heaven, buddy.

 

[Loony BoB]

Nice bump.

Most of the new parodies of my username at EoFF aren't appropriate to list here, but I can assure you they include: STDs, pregnancy, goats, shaving, stripping, touching of buttocks and other such things. Good times.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

Nice bump.

Most of the new parodies of my username at EoFF aren't appropriate to list here, but I can assure you they include: STDs, pregnancy, goats, shaving, stripping, touching of buttocks and other such things. Good times.

Was about to report the previous post...

 

[Richard]

I just couldn't resist adding to this phenominally funny thread and leaving that Smith comment go unnoticed (even the TF gang barely seemed to notice it because of all the furore over the Blackman and Murphy controversies).

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

It was an admirable dig, it has to be said.

 

[GIMH]

That one reminds me of this rubbish.

Interestingly, ben and luke is no longer a banned user

 

[Richard]

Yeah, the reasons for that are the same as those detailed in post #32.

Maybe ban that account again, just for fun?

 

[Richard]

.........