Comes close TBH.Gosh, we somehow forgot about Niall "not-a-sellout" O'Brien. Better keeper than England have itbt![]()
A fair few people would make a case for it (especially in ODIs).Comes close TBH.
I agree with the Ashraeful part. But disagree Siddique. He has talent and is just one or two innings away from a good show. Of course, Kayes is a joke of an opener. But Ashraeful beats him.Ashraful had a terrible year, is out of form and is generally grossly over-rated in general. That said, he's still one of the six best batsmen in the country for mine and more likely to do something noteworthy in the medium term than several others. Ocassionally he is capable of playing a very good Test innings against good bowlers - until there is evidence to suggest someone else can, Ashraful's place shouldn't be called into question. Averaging 10 having proven the ability to average 35 > averaging 20 having proven the ability to average 20.
I'd play Rajin Saleh ahead of him at this point, but I'd still play Ashraful ahead of Kayes, and Siddique, so it's immaterial.
Did you forget his marvellous 100 against the best Aussies side in ODI. He won a few AODIs for his team single handedly.They've only won one Test and he scored 19 and 22 against the Zimbabwe team that even the Man from Delmonte rejected.
Did you forget his marvellous 100 against the best Aussies side in ODI. He won a few AODIs for his team single handedly.
If a teams best result is a nearly win then there is no greater damning.Would say that's very unfair too. Especially as they very nearly beat NZ recently in Bangladesh.
Zimbabwe coming back to tests then?I expect them to win a game or 2 soon, just because it is impossible to lose every game. It will not mean anything though.
Fair point .If a teams best result is a nearly win then there is no greater damning.
It is improbable that a team could play so many matches and not win one. It isnt even as if they are drawing games.
Nearly winning counts for naught and when that is the best performance then it is embarassing.
I expect them to win a game or 2 soon, just because it is impossible to lose every game. It will not mean anything though.
A rather hopeful attitude rather than one based on fact. They are still a milion miles away from other Test nations.Fair point .
We can't get rid of Bangladesh now though after everything that has been done for them. Surely they'll improve sometime soon.
I have no issue with that idea at all.I've been a supporter of a two-tier system for some time now, and if implemented properly it could really work.
New Zealand was a joke for much longer time though...
Halle Berry could create some flutters in opposition dressing rooms. Their record is a joke, Ireland and Kenya could both have a better shot at the longer format (it's not like they could do much worse).
So how many Mohammed Rafiques or Shakib Al hasans Ireland has produced? None. I'd take Mashrfe Mortaza over Boyd Rankin on any day of the year.No disrespect to Bangladesh, but it's not like they're shuffling with a full deck when it comes to players, is it?
WRT to them versus Ireland; how many batsmen of the quality of Ed Joyce, Eoin Morgan or even William Porterfield have the Banglas produced? When fit I'd take Boyd Rankin ahead of most Bangladesh seamers too.
Shakib >> BothaBangas don't have Andre Botha![]()
Shakib looks to have something about him, but Rafique? Do me a favour.So how many Mohammed Rafiques or Shakib Al hasans Ireland has produced? None. I'd take Mashrfe Mortaza over Boyd Rankin on any day of the year.
Kyle who ever have bowled to FCC player who **** against spin. Rafiqe has bowled to players who are much accomplished in playing spin.Shakib looks to have something about him, but Rafique? Do me a favour.Kyle McCallan's career figures match up pretty well against his and he can't even get a county contract.
Even if all that were true (equating Bangladesh's domestic first-class competition to New Zealand's is self-defeating because if the players were any good, where are they on the international stage?!? But anyway...), having a (38 year old) spinner who may or may not be better than an Irish offie who can't get a domestic English contract even is an argument for Bangladesh having test status how, exactly? Intrigued to know.Kyle who ever have bowled to FCC player who **** against spin. Rafiqe has bowled to players who are much accomplished in playing spin.
And if you compare Vettori, who is the premier SLA bowler of the era (discounting the minnows)
Vettori Avg 37.7 SR 82.7, Rafique Avg 41.1 SR 84.6.
Vettori FCC Avg 31.0, Rafique Avg 28.0
I am LMAO when I tend to think that Vettori will not be selected for a county team based on that stats. In todays cricket, Rafique will walk in to any non-sub conitinental side as the spinner.