• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Insane and mockery of Test cricket

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Gosh, we somehow forgot about Niall "not-a-sellout" O'Brien. Better keeper than England have itbt :p
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Comes close TBH.
A fair few people would make a case for it (especially in ODIs).

The point is, Ireland should be nowhere near test cricket, but if they were I'd back them to make a better fist of it than Bangladesh. So it's a bit disheartening to see a team made of inferior players who show no fight and generally act like they don't want to be there when quality players like Morgan and O'Brien can only dream of playing tests for their country.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Ashraful had a terrible year, is out of form and is generally grossly over-rated in general. That said, he's still one of the six best batsmen in the country for mine and more likely to do something noteworthy in the medium term than several others. Ocassionally he is capable of playing a very good Test innings against good bowlers - until there is evidence to suggest someone else can, Ashraful's place shouldn't be called into question. Averaging 10 having proven the ability to average 35 > averaging 20 having proven the ability to average 20.

I'd play Rajin Saleh ahead of him at this point, but I'd still play Ashraful ahead of Kayes, and Siddique, so it's immaterial.
 

susudear

Banned
Don't agree

Ashraful had a terrible year, is out of form and is generally grossly over-rated in general. That said, he's still one of the six best batsmen in the country for mine and more likely to do something noteworthy in the medium term than several others. Ocassionally he is capable of playing a very good Test innings against good bowlers - until there is evidence to suggest someone else can, Ashraful's place shouldn't be called into question. Averaging 10 having proven the ability to average 35 > averaging 20 having proven the ability to average 20.

I'd play Rajin Saleh ahead of him at this point, but I'd still play Ashraful ahead of Kayes, and Siddique, so it's immaterial.
I agree with the Ashraeful part. But disagree Siddique. He has talent and is just one or two innings away from a good show. Of course, Kayes is a joke of an opener. But Ashraeful beats him.
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
Would say that's very unfair too. Especially as they very nearly beat NZ recently in Bangladesh.
If a teams best result is a nearly win then there is no greater damning.

It is improbable that a team could play so many matches and not win one. It isnt even as if they are drawing games.

Nearly winning counts for naught and when that is the best performance then it is embarassing.

I expect them to win a game or 2 soon, just because it is impossible to lose every game. It will not mean anything though.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
If a teams best result is a nearly win then there is no greater damning.

It is improbable that a team could play so many matches and not win one. It isnt even as if they are drawing games.

Nearly winning counts for naught and when that is the best performance then it is embarassing.

I expect them to win a game or 2 soon, just because it is impossible to lose every game. It will not mean anything though.
Fair point .

We can't get rid of Bangladesh now though after everything that has been done for them. Surely they'll improve sometime soon. Anyone know how long it look Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka and NZ to win their first Test?

Perhaps it's time to promote Kenya, Scotland, Ireland, Netherlands to Test cricket to even it out and go to a 2 Tier Test level with promotion/relegation?
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
Fair point .

We can't get rid of Bangladesh now though after everything that has been done for them. Surely they'll improve sometime soon.
A rather hopeful attitude rather than one based on fact. They are still a milion miles away from other Test nations.

It brings to mind the old concept from the broadroom and the warroom of "Never Reinforce Failure"

There has to be a point where its becomes a complete waste of time and a black hole for time, effort and resources.

I've been a supporter of a two-tier system for some time now, and if implemented properly it could really work.
I have no issue with that idea at all.
 

Migara

International Coach
...

Halle Berry could create some flutters in opposition dressing rooms. Their record is a joke, Ireland and Kenya could both have a better shot at the longer format (it's not like they could do much worse).
New Zealand was a joke for much longer time though
 

Migara

International Coach
No disrespect to Bangladesh, but it's not like they're shuffling with a full deck when it comes to players, is it?

WRT to them versus Ireland; how many batsmen of the quality of Ed Joyce, Eoin Morgan or even William Porterfield have the Banglas produced? When fit I'd take Boyd Rankin ahead of most Bangladesh seamers too.
So how many Mohammed Rafiques or Shakib Al hasans Ireland has produced? None. I'd take Mashrfe Mortaza over Boyd Rankin on any day of the year.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
So how many Mohammed Rafiques or Shakib Al hasans Ireland has produced? None. I'd take Mashrfe Mortaza over Boyd Rankin on any day of the year.
Shakib looks to have something about him, but Rafique? Do me a favour. :laugh: Kyle McCallan's career figures match up pretty well against his and he can't even get a county contract.
 

Migara

International Coach
Shakib looks to have something about him, but Rafique? Do me a favour. :laugh: Kyle McCallan's career figures match up pretty well against his and he can't even get a county contract.
Kyle who ever have bowled to FCC player who **** against spin. Rafiqe has bowled to players who are much accomplished in playing spin.

And if you compare Vettori, who is the premier SLA bowler of the era (discounting the minnows)

Vettori Avg 37.7 SR 82.7, Rafique Avg 41.1 SR 84.6.
Vettori FCC Avg 31.0, Rafique Avg 28.0

I am LMAO when I tend to think that Vettori will not be selected for a county team based on that stats. In todays cricket, Rafique will walk in to any non-sub conitinental side as the spinner.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Kyle who ever have bowled to FCC player who **** against spin. Rafiqe has bowled to players who are much accomplished in playing spin.

And if you compare Vettori, who is the premier SLA bowler of the era (discounting the minnows)

Vettori Avg 37.7 SR 82.7, Rafique Avg 41.1 SR 84.6.
Vettori FCC Avg 31.0, Rafique Avg 28.0

I am LMAO when I tend to think that Vettori will not be selected for a county team based on that stats. In todays cricket, Rafique will walk in to any non-sub conitinental side as the spinner.
Even if all that were true (equating Bangladesh's domestic first-class competition to New Zealand's is self-defeating because if the players were any good, where are they on the international stage?!? But anyway...), having a (38 year old) spinner who may or may not be better than an Irish offie who can't get a domestic English contract even is an argument for Bangladesh having test status how, exactly? Intrigued to know.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
I quite like Mushfiqur Rahim, he's certainly an acceptable Test Wicket Keeper, better than West Indies current keeper Ramdin for sure.

Mortaza is quite okay, but obviously averaging just over 40 isn't good enough. Shakib Al Hasan has been tremendous this year and at only 21 he has an exciting future, hopefully he doesn't get overbowled though!

Tamim Iqbal is probably the young batter with the most talent, interested in seeing how he progresses.

I think we need to be a bit more patient, remembering that most of the team is under 25 years of age, so they do have some time of their side.

One thing what I hope doesn't happen is that this group all gets dropped at around the same time, so Bangladesh bring in a new batch of under 21s again.
 
Last edited:

Top