Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
Unrest in the ranksvandemataram said:Oh come on, there are also good reports in news paper on Balaji, Pathan,Z hussain, Iqbal siddique, Youhannan etc, Mumbai is simply not the factor.
Unrest in the ranksvandemataram said:Oh come on, there are also good reports in news paper on Balaji, Pathan,Z hussain, Iqbal siddique, Youhannan etc, Mumbai is simply not the factor.
Maybe my statement was a bit enlarged. But i get really angry when Gavaskar,Ravi and Bhogle just go on talking that Ajit should be picked. They say if 6 batsmen can't do the job then how can you expect the 7 th to do even after India has won so many many matches b'coz of the 7 th batsman. They always say Ajit is a strike bowler and should be picked. If any decent bowler got as many chances as he got then he would have secured his place.vandemataram said:Oh come on, there are also good reports in news paper on Balaji, Pathan,Z hussain, Iqbal siddique, Youhannan etc, Mumbai is simply not the factor.
I have seen Salvi and he looks a very good bowler to me, maybe i shouldn't have compared him with Glen (that was a bit over the top :P ). But one thing i can say for sure, Avishkar Salvi is here to stay, he's not going to disappear like Tinu, Ganesh etc.The guy is hell talented, and someone with lots of confidence and passion for cricket!
How could you be so hard on our hero! We see him little enough as it is...lord_of_darkness said:Yea they always go on about Ajit needing to be selected
HE IS PURE CRAP i tell you and thats it , the only reason hes in is because he is from mumbai like when kambli used to be kept brought in....
they should groom someone else instead of agarkar..
cant handle him even 1 tiny bitHow could you be so hard on our hero! We see him little enough as it is...
Well he has a FC Average of 60odd to prove it's not a fluke too. I think he just fell out of favour with the selectors after a few discipline problems.lord_of_darkness said:cant handle him even 1 tiny bit
and Kambli was good in his prime almost as good as Sachin similar style but with an avg of 52 for test ask ur self where has he been then for the past 2-3 or more years?
playing fc in S.A.F but has he ever been considered for selections till now ?
marc71178 said:Ironic that seeing as I wasn't responding to you!
vishnureddy said:Maybe my statement was a bit enlarged. But i get really angry when Gavaskar,Ravi and Bhogle just go on talking that Ajit should be picked. They say if 6 batsmen can't do the job then how can you expect the 7 th to do even after India has won so many many matches b'coz of the 7 th batsman. They always say Ajit is a strike bowler and should be picked. If any decent bowler got as many chances as he got then he would have secured his place.
100+ ODI wickets at 29 + the fastest to 50 ODI wickets doesn't look like a failure...Choora said:I guess AgarKAR is probably probably end up as the lone failure in the "Kar Group"
Well he's a failure at the longer format of the game. In ODI Ajit has performed well at different time, but he has hardly been consistent!Rik said:100+ ODI wickets at 29 + the fastest to 50 ODI wickets doesn't look like a failure...
Yeah in Tests his bowling is just not effective. I still feel he has a role to play in the Indian ODI team, as an All-Rounder, though he would need to work on his batting a bit. He's surely better than Bangar who's bowling is nowhere near international class and sometimes so is his batting.Choora said:Well he's a failure at the longer format of the game. In ODI Ajit has performed well at different time, but he has hardly been consistent!